Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 13]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Usha Kiran Kerketta vs State Of Chhattisgarh 3 Wps/1561/2017 ... on 24 January, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                          1

                                                                            NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         Writ Petition (S) No. 4197 of 2016

        Smt. Usha Kiran Kerketta W/o Late Shri Amrit Kerketta, Aged About 50
        Years R/o Flat No D-1/39, 4th Floor, Chauhan Town, Junawani Road, Bhilai,
        Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

                                                                     ---- Petitioner

                                      Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Department Of Law And
        Legislative Affairs, Mahandi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur District Raipur
        Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

     2. Registrar General Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District :
        Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

     3. District And Session Judge, South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District :
        Dantewada, Chhattisgarh
                                                           ---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Mr. T. K. Jha, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Dilman Rathi Minj, Dy. Govt. Adv.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24/01/18

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation for grant of pay-scale towards A.C.P which is pending consideration before respondent No. 2 since 21.08.2015 and has not been decided till date.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Be that as it may, respondent No. 2 is directed to consider the representation of petitioner for grant of pay-scale towards A.C.P. and take a decision on the same expeditiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner would also be at liberty to make an additional representation before the concerned authority, if 2 any.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka