Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Suresh Chandra Jana vs The State Of West Bengal on 22 April, 2014

òITEM NO.10                    REGISTRAR COURT.2                   SECTION IIB


              S U P R E M E     C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 31 OF 2008
                        BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURA



SURESH CHANDRA JANA                                      Appellant (s)

                    VERSUS

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS                               Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE ADDL. DOCUMENTS
WITH APPEAL(CRL) NO. 32 of 2008
(With office report)

Date: 22/04/2014      This Appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)
                        Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya,Adv.
                        Mr.Mohit Paul,adv.
                        Mr. Anip Sachthey

For Respondent(s)        Ms.Minakshi Ghosh,adv.
                         Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.
                         Mr. V.N. Raghupathy ,Adv.
                         Mr.Mohit Paul,adv.
                         Mr. Anip Sachthey ,Adv


              UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                  O R D E R
Crl.Appeal No.31/2008

None for the appellant. Ld.counsel for the respondents are present.

Mr.Deepak Kumar Jena, Ld.advocate has stated that his name has not been shown in the cause list. Office to update the database accordingly.

.........2 ITEM NO.10 -2- Crl.Appeal No.32/2008 Ld.counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent are present.

What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although by order dated 12.03.2014 of this Court the Ld.counsel for the parties were given four week’s time as last chance for filing the additional documents in both the matters, yet they have not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the same shall be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Court under the rules.

(M.K.HANJURA) Registrar SB