Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Harnam Singh Alias Rinku Chandel vs . State Of H.P. And Ors. on 28 January, 2022

Author: Satyen Vaidya

Bench: Satyen Vaidya

.

Harnam Singh alias Rinku Chandel Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWP. No. 3821 of 2021 28.01.2022 Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr. Additional Advocate General, Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Kamal Kant Chandel, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Manoj Bagga, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent/State.

In compliance to order dated 26.11.2021, status report is filed. Para­5 of the report reads as under:­ "That as per updated status annexed at annexure A­1, it is evident that a total of 159 no. of encroachments have been removed completely and 8 no. of encroachments have been removed partially after 26.11.2021 when the directions were issued by the Hon'ble Court. Thus, the respondents are making every effort to remove all kinds of encroachments alongside Highways and no effort shall be spared in this regard." Noticeably, the respondent appears to have made efforts as is evident from the above­noted extract of the status report. Fresh status report be filed within four weeks.

List on 03.03.2022.

(Satyen Vaidya) Vacation Judge 28th January, 2022 (sushma) ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 20:12:09 :::CIS