Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Pd ( Ramprasad Roy vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 21 March, 2014

Author: Ashim Kumar Roy

Bench: Ashim Kumar Roy

                                                           1

 392
 &
393    21.3.2014.                         W.P. No.26460 (W) of 2013
pd                            ( Ramprasad Roy -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.
                                                   with
                                            W.P. No.26462(W) of 2013
                                    (Kaberi Roy -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.)


                    Mr. Arka Pratim Chowdhury,
                    Ms. Arpita Chakraborty,
                    Mr. Sagnik Basu .... For the petitioner.

                    Md. Yasin Ali,
                    Mrs. Tapati Sengupta... For the State.



                                 Since the issues involved in W.P. No.26460

                    (W) of 2013 and W.P.No.26462 (W) of 2013 are

                    common and identical, both the matters are taken

                    up for hearing together and are disposed of by this

                    common order.

                               It appears from the submission of the

                    learned Counsel of the petitioner as well as the

                    content of both the writ applications, the only

                    grievance of the writ petitioner in both the writ

                    applications is this that pursuant to the complaints

                    they lodged to the police, being marked with the

                    letter "P-10" in both the writ applications, although

                    the content thereof clearly discloses the commission

                    of cognizable offence, still the police has not drawn

                    any F.I.R. nor undertaken any investigation.
                             2

       Now, Md. Yasin Ali, the Counsel for the State

produced before this Court the action taken report

and submitted that on the basis of both the

aforesaid complaints, already the police registered

two F.I.R., namely, Sonarpur Police Station Case

No.981/2013 and Sonarpur Police Station Case

No.982/2013 respectively, relating to the offence

punishable under Sections 420/468/471 of the

Indian Penal Code. It is further submitted that in

connection    with   both   the       cases,     the      private

respondents have surrendered in court and have

been released on bail and the investigation is still continuing and the police is likely to submit the charge sheet shortly.

Having regard to the aforesaid development, nothing survives in both these writ applications and accordingly, the same stand dismissed.

Let the action taken report produced today in the court be taken on record.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties at an early date.

( Ashim Kumar Roy, J. ) 3