Patna High Court - Orders
Surya Kant Nirala vs The Union Of India And Ors on 7 December, 2022
Author: Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench: Mohit Kumar Shah
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3511 of 2015
======================================================
Surya Kant Nirala Son of Late Gandhari Prasad Singh, Resident of village
and P.O Tungi, Biharsharif, District Nalanda
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Information and
Broadcasting 'A' Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
2. The Under Secretary BC-II Ministry of Information and
Broadcasting,Government of India, 'A' Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
3. The Director, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. Electronic Media
Monitoring Centre, Government of India, 'A' Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New
Delhi.
4. The Secretary General, Broadcast Contact Complaints Council C/o The
Indian Broadcasting Foundation, B 304, 3rd Floor, Ansel Plaza, Khelgaon
Marg, New Delhi.
5. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary , Information and Public
Relations Department, Bihar Patna
6. The Director and Producer of Bharat Ka Veer Putra Maharana Pratap
through the Sony T.V. India, Multi Screen Media Pt. Ltd, 3 rd floor, Interface
Bld, no. 7, Malad Link road, Malad (W), Mumbai (Maharashtra)
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amar Prakash, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr Prem Ranjan Raj, AC to SC 7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
ORAL ORDER
2 07-12-2022Though the present writ petition was filed for directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate action against telecasting of objectionable serial pertaining to "Maharana Pratap" by Sony T.V. Channel, however, it is informed by the learned counsel for the respondents that the telecast of the said serial is already over, hence, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition and moreover, if Patna High Court CWJC No.3511 of 2015(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 the petitioner is aggrieved by telecasting of any indecent and vulgar scenes, he may take recourse to the appropriate remedy available under the law i.e. filing of a defamation case.
Having regard to the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this Court finds that the present writ petition is not only ill-advised but has also been rendered infructuous, on account of efflux of time, hence is dismissed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/-
U