Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr. Prabhakar Reddy vs Spmcil - Security Printing Press, ... on 24 January, 2013

                            dsUnzh; lwpuk vk;ksx
                                    Central Information Commission
                                   2 ry] foxa 'c' / 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing
                            vxLr ØkfUr Hkou / August Kranti Bhavan
                             Hkhdkth dkek Iysl/ Bhikaji Cama Place
                           ubZ fnYyh ­ 110066 / New Delhi - 110066
                                                  Phone No.011­26183996
                                                      *****


                                                                          No.CIC/SM/C/2013/000033
                                                                                                          
                                                                                Dated: 24 January 2013


 Name of the Complainant                      :      Shri Prabhakar Reddy,
                                                     Plot No. 151, Vekateshwara Enclave, 
                                                     Secunderabad, 
                                                     Andhra Pradesh - 500 011.


 Name of the Public Authority                 :      The Appellate Authority 
                                                     Security Printing Press,
                                                     Saifabad, Hyderabad.


                                                  ORDER

Shri Prabhakar Reddy of Secunderabad has complained to the Central  Information Commission that he received no reply/information from the Central  Public Information Officer although he had filed his RTI­application on 16 April  2012.  A copy each of the RTI­application and the complaint are enclosed for  ready reference. 

2. It is noted that the Complainant did not have an opportunity to go to the  Appellate   Authority   and   has   directly   approached   the   Commission   with   his  complaint.   In exercise of powers vested under Section 18(1) of the Right to  Information   (RTI)   Act,   we   direct   the   Appellate   Authority   to   enquire   into   the  allegations made by the Complainant and after giving him an opportunity of  hearing, to pass an appropriate order with a view to ensuring that the desired  information is provided to the Complainant without any further loss of time.

3. We also direct the Appellate Authority to obtain the explanation of the  CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the same  to us along with his comments before 26 February 2013.  We will decide on the  imposition of penalty on the CPIO in terms of Section 20(1) of the  Right to  Information (RTI) Act thereafter.    

4. In case the Complainant is not satisfied with the orders of the Appellate  Authority, he is free to approach this Commission again in second appeal.

5. The Commission ordered accordingly.

(Satyananda Mishra) Chief Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against  application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this  Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla) Deputy Registrar