Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Unni Krishnan E vs The Union Of India And 2 Ors on 5 March, 2026

Author: Soumitra Saikia

Bench: Soumitra Saikia

                                                                        Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010057212022




                                                                 undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/2160/2022

            UNNI KRISHNAN E
            S/O- AYYAPPAN, R/O- NIRMALAYAM HOUSE NO. 5/521, ATM NAGAR,
            NALLAPILLY, MATTUMATHA, DIST- PALAKKAD, KERALA, PIN-678553



            VERSUS

            THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
            REP. BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW
            DELHI-110001

            2:THE DIG
             SHQ
             BORDER SECURITY FORCE
             P.O- SILCHAR
             DIST- CACHAR
             SILCHAR
             PIN-788025

            3:THE COMMANDANT
             7 BN BSF
             SETTLEMENT ROAD
             MAIZDHI CAMP
             P.O AND DIST- KARIMGANJ
            ASSAM
             PIN-78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : DR. B AHMED, MS. H SARMA,MR A U AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR. S K MEDHI
                                                                        Page No.# 2/2

                                     BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

                                         ORDER

05.03.2026 Mr. A.U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arguing counsel Dr. B. Ahmed is indisposed and will not be able to argue this matter, he therefore, seeks liberty to make alternative arrangements and prays for four weeks time.

2. Ms. M. Das, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC for the respondents does not object to the prayer made.

3. Accordingly, list this matter on 08.04.2026.

4. Interim order, if any passed earlier will be continued till the next date fixed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant