Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Rajeesh Kashyap 18 Wps/6454/2019 Om ... on 27 August, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                 1
                                                    CRMP No. 1951 of 2019


                                                                NAFR

      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                      CRMP No. 1951 of 2019

    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Station House Officer,

      Police    Station    Pamgarh,     District   Janjgir    Chamap

      Chhattisgarh.


                                                      ---- Applicant

                               Versus

    Rajeesh Kashyap S/o Dallu @ Sarju Kashyap Aged About

      20 Years R/o Village Jevra Police Station Mulmula, District

      Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.


                                                   ---- Respondent



For Applicant             :-    Shri Pawan Kesharwani, PL


        Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &
         Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya, JJ.

Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

27/08/2019

1. On due consideration delay of 13 days in filing of Cr.M.P. is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2019 which is an application for condonation of delay occurred in filing of the 2 CRMP No. 1951 of 2019 Cr.M.P. is allowed.

2. The trial Court has acquitted the accused of the charges under Section 363, 366, 376 of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. Accused has allegedly committed forcible sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix for a period of about three years. Even though there is finding of the trial Court that the prosecutrix is less than 18 years of age on the date of incident, the fact remains that when examined in Court, the prosecutrix has not supported the prosecution at any stage of her examination. She has denied the entire prosecution case. She only speaks about her affair with the accused but denies that he has ever committed forcible sexual intercourse with her.

4. Considering the nature and quality of evidence on record, we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal.

5. Accordingly, the Cr.M.P. deserves to be and is hereby dismissed.

                 Sd/-                                       Sd/-
         (Prashant Kumar Mishra)                 (Gautam Chourdiya)
               Judge                                  Judge


Ayushi