Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Neeta A.Bhandari vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors. And ... on 17 February, 2020

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

                                                                    23-chs-26-2018.doc




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                    CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.26 OF 2018
                                  IN
                         SUIT NO.1182 OF 2003

Neeta A. Bhandari                                        ...Applicant
          vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others                          ...Respondents

Mr. Naushad Engineer a/w. Mr. Sunil Gunjan, Mr. Jayesh M., Mr. Shrikant S. i/b. RMG Law Associates, for the Plaintiff Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP for the Defendant-State.

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2020 P.C.:

. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant/Plaintiff.

2. The Chamber Summons is taken out to bring the legal representatives of Defendant No. 3 Amrutrao B. Patankar who died on 8th January, 2014. In the Application it is averred that the Plaintiff was informed about the death of Defendant No. 3 by the learned counsel for the Defendant on 27 th October, 2017.

The learned counsel for Defendant No. 3 has also informed the names of the legal representatives of Defendant No. 3.

Vishal Parekar 1/3 ::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2020 06:13:06 :::

23-chs-26-2018.doc

3. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the proposed legal representatives of Defendant No. 3 have been served with the Chamber Summons. The postal acknowledgments evidencing the service of the Chamber Summons on the proposed legal representatives have been received.

4. The fact that the factum of death of Defendant No. 3 and Defendant N. 3 being survived by the Respondents was informed to the Plaintiff by the learned counsel of Defendant No. 3 on 27th October, 2017 and the Plaintiff has thereafter taken out this Application to bring legal representatives of Defendant No. 3 on 4th January, 2018, warrants that the Application be allowed.

5. Hence, the Application stands allowed.

6. The Plaintiff is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment to the Plaint so as to implead the legal representatives of Defendant No. 3 as proposed in the Schedule Vishal Parekar 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2020 06:13:06 ::: 23-chs-26-2018.doc appended to the Chamber Summons.

7. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of three weeks.

8. The Plaintiff shall serve writ of summons on the newly impleaded Defendants within a period of four weeks thereafter.

9. The re-verification is dispensed with.

10. Chamber Summons stands disposed of.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 3/3 ::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2020 06:13:06 :::