Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Surendra Kumar Vyas & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 17 November, 2017

Author: Dinesh Mehta

Bench: Dinesh Mehta

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7239 / 2017

1. Surendra Kumar Vyas S/o Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of- D/390, Murlidhar Vyas Nagar,
Bikaner.


2. Jhanwar Lal Suthar S/o Shri Pappu Ram Suthar, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of- Shiv Shakti Nagar, Gangashahar, Bikaner.


3. Ankur Dadhich S/o Shri Jyoti Swaroop Dadhich, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of- 49, Dachich Nagar, Outside Mahamandir 3rd
Pole, Jodhpur.


4. Bhimchand Gosai S/o Shri Bhura Ram Gosai, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of- Shivnathpura, Ward No.23, Sanchore, District
Jalore.


                                                       ----Petitioners


                                 Versus


1. The State of Rajasthan Through the Principal Secretary,
Treasury & Accounts, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.


2. The Directorate, Treasury & Accounts, Through the Director,
Directorate, Treasury & Accounts, Government of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.


3. The Finance Department Through the Principal Secretary,
Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.


4. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission Through the
Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.


                                                      ----Respondents
                                (2 of 2)

                                                     [CW-7239/2017]




_____________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s)   : Mr. Ramindra Singh Saluja
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikas Choudhary, associate of Mr. S.S.
                    Ladrecha, AAG
_____________________________________________________
                    JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
                               Order
17/11/2017

     Heard learned counsel for the parties.

     In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that

the respondents may go ahead with the appointments, however

four posts for the petitioners' category shall be kept vacant.

     List this matter on 08.12.2017.

                                                (DINESH MEHTA), J.

Upendra/116