Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Commr.Of Central Excise vs M/S Kolety Gum Industries on 22 April, 2016
Bench: A.K. Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4192 OF 2008
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXICSE, VAPI ... APPELLANT (S)
VS.
M/S. KOLETY GUM INDUSTRIES ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
In this case the dispute is about the classification of goods known as “Guar Gum and Guar Dal Flour”. As per the assessee, the goods should be covered by Chapter sub-heading 1301.10 whereas the Revenue seeks classification under Chapter heading 1101.00. The Tribunal has decided the case in favour of the assessee herein. The Tribunal has also, in the instant case, held that the demand in any case was time barred.
Learned senior counsel appearing for the Department has drawn our attention to the judgment of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Krap Chem Pvt.Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Daman, Rajkot reported in 2015 (325) ELT 339 (Tri.- LB), wherein larger Bench has taken the view which is in favour of the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Revenue and the aforesaid goods are classified under Date: 2016.05.03 13:24:51 IST Reason: Chapter sub-heading 1301.10. He also points out that the 1 aforesaid judgment of the larger Bench was not challenged by filing appeal by the assessee in the said case. We need not go into the aforesaid issue inasmuch as the assessee would succeeed on the ground of limitation itself because of the reason that the judgment of the Tribunal on the issue of limitation is perfectly justified inasmuch as at the relevant time there was conflicting judgment of the Tribunal and thus the action of the respondent in classifying the goods was clearly bonafide and larger period of limitation would not be available to the Department.
The civil appeal thus fails on the ground of limitation and is dismissed accordingly.
............J. [A.K. SIKRI] ......................J. [ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN] New Delhi;
22nd April, 2016.
2 ITEM NO.304 COURT NO.10 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.4192/2008 COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S KOLETY GUM INDUSTRIES Respondent(s)
(With appln. for c/delay in re-filing appeal and office report) Date : 22/04/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. K. Radhakrishnan,Sr.Adv.
Ms. Nisha Bagchi,Adv.
Ms. Binu Tamta,Adv.
Mr. T.M. Singh,Adv.
Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava,Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran,Adv.
Mr. Anandh K.,Adv.
Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya,Adv. Ms. L. Chamoye,Adv.
Mr. Hemant Bajaj,Adv.
Mr. M.P. Devanath,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
(Anita Malhotra) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty)
Court Master Court Master
(Signed order is placed on the file.) 3