Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

P.Dhanaseelan vs The Union Of India on 24 November, 2021

Author: Anita Sumanth

Bench: Anita Sumanth

                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 24.11.2021

                                                        CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

                                  W.P.(MD)Nos. 6269, 10776, 13651 and 15304 of 2018
                                                        and
                                  W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 6102, 7821, 9882 and 9883 of 2018


                     W.P.(MD) No.6269 of 2018

                     P.Dhanaseelan                                    ...   Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     1.The Union of India,
                       rep. By its Joint Secretary,
                       Ministry of Human Resource Development,
                       Department of Higher Education,
                       Shastri Bhavan
                       New Delhi 110 001.

                     2.The University Grants Commission,
                       rep. By its Joint Secretary,
                       Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,
                       New Delhi 110 002

                     3.National Institute Technology,
                       Tiruchirapallyi,
                       rep. By its Director,
                       Thuvakudi,
                       Tiruchirapalli, 620 015                        ...   Respondents

                     Page 1 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                            Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking for a Writ of Mandamus commanding the third respondent to
                     consider the application of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor
                     in the Department of Architecture made in pursuance of the advertisement
                     No.NITT/R/F/2017/03 dated 11.10.2017 issued by the third respondent by
                     applying the rule of reservation, after notifying the number of vacancies
                     reserved for SC category in the cadre of Assistant professor by treating the
                     Department of Architect as a 'Unit' in the third respondent institute as
                     directed by second respondent in their letter No.F.1-5/2006(SCT) dated
                     05.03.2018.

                     W.P.(MD) No.10776 of 2018

                     P.Dhanaseelan                                       ...    Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                     1.National Institute Technology,
                       Tiruchirapallyi,
                       rep. By its Registrar,
                       Thuvakudi,
                       Tiruchirapalli, 620 015

                     2.Mini Shaji Thomas                                 ...    Respondents

                            Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     culminating to the order of termination, terminating the temporary services
                     of the petitioner, passed by the first respondent in their office
                     Ref.No.NITT/Estt./Unit-I/4-11/2018-19/76, dated 27.04.2018 and to quash
                     the same and consequently direct the the first respondent to permit the
                     petitioner to continue as “temporary faculty” in the first respondent institute
                     in the Department of Architecture till the petitioner is replaced by the
                     regularly appointed teaching faculty, in the Department of Architecture of
                     the first respondent institute.


                     Page 2 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     W.P.(MD) No.13651 of 2018

                     P.Dhanaseelan                                      ...    Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                     1.National Institute Technology,
                       Tiruchirapallyi,
                       rep. By its Registrar,
                       Thuvakudi,
                       Tiruchirapalli, 620 015

                     2.Mini Shaji Thomas                                ...    Respondents

                           Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     culminating to the advertisement No.R/TF-1/2018 dated 13.06.2018, issued
                     by the first respondent for the appointment of 28 temporary faculties in
                     various Departments of the first respondent institute and to quash the same
                     and consequently to direct the first respondent to institute the petitioner as
                     Fine Arts temporary faculty in the Department of Architecture in the first
                     respondent institute, who was selected and appointed in pursuance of the
                     advertisement dated 06.05.2017 till such time he is being placed by
                     regularly selected candidate.

                     W.P.(MD) No.15304 of 2018

                     P.Dhanaseelan                                      ...    Petitioner

                                                          Vs.
                     1.National Institute Technology,
                      Tiruchirapallyi,
                      rep. By its Registrar,
                      Thuvakudi,
                      Tiruchirapalli, 620 015

                     2.Mini Shaji Thomas                                ...    Respondents

                     Page 3 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                            Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     culminating to the advertisement No.NITT/R/TF-2/2018 dated 04.07.2018,
                     issued by the first respondent for the appointment of 97 temporary faculties
                     in various Departments of the first respondent institute and to quash the
                     same and consequently to direct the first respondent to institute the
                     petitioner as Fine Arts temporary faculty in the Department of Architecture
                     in the first respondent institute, who was selected and appointed in
                     pursuance of the advertisement dated 06.05.2017 till such time he is being
                     placed by regularly selected candidate.



                                  For Petitioner         ...   Mr. Sakthi Kumaran
                                  For Respondents        ...   Mr. R. Murugappan
                                                               for Ministry of Human Resource
                                                               Development,
                                                               Mr. V. Maharajan
                                                               for the University Grant Commission
                                                               Mrs. Maria Roseline
                                                               for the National Institute Technology




                                                     COMMON ORDER


The above writ petitions are rendered infructuous in light of the challenge by this petitioner to a notification dated 11.10.2017 in W.P.(MD) No. 19024 of 2018.

Page 4 of 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners make an endorsement to this effect. These writ petitions are thus dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

24.11.2021 Index: Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking Internet: Yes mnr Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned Page 5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To

1.The Joint Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education, Shastri Bhavan New Delhi 110 001.

2. The Joint Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002

3. The Director, .National Institute Technology, Tiruchirapallyi, Thuvakudi, Tiruchirapalli, 620 015 Page 6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.

mnr W.P.(MD)Nos. 6269, 10776, 13651 and 15304 of 2018 and W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 6102, 7821, 9882 and 9883 of 2018 24.11.2021 Page 7 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis