Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Krishnappa vs Muniswamy on 31 October, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

   DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013

                     BEFORE

         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO

       WRIT PETITION NO.38119/2013 (GM-CPC)


BETWEEN:

KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKANANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT MAJOR
R/AT KESARNAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGARPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT
                                    .. PETITIONER
(BY SRI.M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADV.,)

AND:

MUNISWAMY
S/O KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT KESARNAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGARPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT
                                     .. RESPONDENT

     THIS   WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER
ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS RELATING
TO R.A.80/2012 FROM THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KGF AND TO QUASH THE
ORDER ANNEXURE-C DATED 02.08.2013 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.80/2012 FROM THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL
                             2


SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, K.G.F. AND ALLOW IA NO.2
FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 1 RULE
10()2) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC TO IMPLEAD HIM AS
RESPONDENT IN THE APPEAL.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:


                        ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition. The memo is placed on record.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo filed.

Sd/-

JUDGE Bsv