Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sudeep Shetty vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                          -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:7337
                                                   CRL.P No. 5081 of 2024




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                   DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
                                       BEFORE
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                        CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5081 OF 2024
            BETWEEN:
            1.   SUDEEP SHETTY,
                 WRONGLY MENTIONED AS
                 SANDEEP SHETTY NITTE IN FIR,
                 S/O LATE SANJEEFVA SHETTY,
                 AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
                 RFA/T NO 5-160B, PALDADI DARKAS HOUSE,
                 NITTE BLOCK, KARKALA TALUK,
                 NITTE, UDUPI 574110..

            2.   PRAKASH H.,
                 WRONGLY MENTIONED AS PRAKASH
                 HANDOTTU IN FIR,
                 S/O SHANKARA POOJARY,
                 AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
                 R/AT 3-86(7), HANDATTU,
                 KOTATHATTU, UDUPI 576221.

            3.   SANJITH POOJARY,
                 WRONGLY MENTIONED AS SANJEETH
                 KOTYAN IN FIR,
Digitally        S/O JAGANNATHA POOJARI,
signed by        AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
VANAMALA         R/AT 3-282, HARDHADDU BARKE,
N                SANOOR POST, KARKALA TALUK,
Location:        UDUPI - 574 114.
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA   4.   P NARASIMHA R GAMSKAR,
                 WRONGLY MENTIONED AS
                 GAMSKAR N IN FIR,
                 S/O P RAGHAVENDR GAVASKAR,
                 AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
                 R./AT 2-69C, SHREE SHANTHADURGA NILAYA
                 VASUKI NAGARA ROAD, SANTHEKATTE,
                 PUTTUR, UDUPI 576 105.
                                                              ...PETITIONERS
            (BY SRI. VASANTHA KUMARA., ADVOCATE)
                                      -2-
                                                        NC: 2025:KHC:7337
                                                 CRL.P No. 5081 of 2024




AND:
1.     STATE OF KARNATAKA,
       BY KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION,
       UDUPI, REP BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
       HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
       HIGH COURT BUILDING,
       BENGALURU 560 001.

2.     SRI SURENDRAS SHETTY,
       S/O RAMESH SHETTY,
       AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
       R/AT SAHANA ESTATE,
       ANKADAKATTE, KOTESHWARA VILLAGE,
       KUNDAPURA, UDUPI 576 222.
                                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. THEJESH, HCGP FOR R1;
    SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR
    SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

      THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.38/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE
OF RESPONDENT NO.1 KUNDAPURA P.S., FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
505(2) OF IPC AND SEC. 66(C) AND 66(D) OF INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                              ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioners seek the following relief:

"Quash the FIR in Crime No.38/2024 pending on the file of Respondent No.1 Kundapura PS, for the offences punishable u/s. 505(2) of the IPC, 1860, & u/s 66-C & 66-D of the IT Act, 2000 (also pending on the file of the 1st Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn) and JMFC Court, Kundapura, Udupi District)."
-3-

NC: 2025:KHC:7337 CRL.P No. 5081 of 2024

2. Learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions, submits that a 'B' Report in the present case would be filed within a period of two [2] weeks from today.

3. Submission is placed on record.

4. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous reserving liberty in favour of respondent No.2 to challenge the 'B' Report and take recourse to such other remedies as available in law.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE RB