Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Rukmani vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 20 December, 2018

Bench: Surya Kant, Ajay Mohan Goel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA       CWP No.   2997 of 2018 .


                                                        Decided on: 20.12.2018





    Rukmani                                                              ...Petitioner

                                             Versus





    State of Himachal Pradesh and another                                ...Respondents


    Coram

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Chief Justice.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1  For the petitioner:      Mr. Sarvedaman Rathore, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General, with   Mr.   J.K.   Verma,   Additional Advocate General, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Assistant Solicitor   General   of   India,   for respondent No. 2.

Surya Kant, Chief Justice. (Oral) The petitioner is stated to be widow of late Shri Rangi   Lal   Sharma   who   served   Forest   and   Wild   Life 1  Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 21/12/2018 22:56:30 :::HCHP 2

Department.   It appears that late Shri Rangi Lal Sharma had   two   wives   and   he   died   on   10 th  October,   2017   leaving .

behind two wives and seven children as his legal heirs.   It further   appears   that   the   first   wife   of   late   Shri   Rangi   Lal Sharma, namely, Smt. Ganga Devi, has also passed away.

Earlier, Smt. Ganga Devi was granted the Family Pension on the premise that she was the first wife of the deceased and lawfully entitled to the same.   After the death of Smt. Ganga Devi, the petitioner has sought the benefit of Family Pension and other terminal benefits on the premise that she also being a lawfully wedded wife of the deceased, is entitled to   such   benefit.     As   no   decision   has   been   taken   on   her application, the instant writ petition has been filed.

2. Ordinarily,   we   would   have   relegated   the petitioner   to   approach   the   Himachal   Pradesh Administrative   Tribunal   but   owing   to   the   fact   that   the petitioner is 80 years old woman, we entertain the instant writ petition and direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's   application­cum­claim   as   contained   in ::: Downloaded on - 21/12/2018 22:56:30 :::HCHP 3 representation dated 1st December, 2018 (Annexure P­7) and take an appropriate decision within a period of one month.

.

If the claim of the petitioner is not fully satisfied, she may approach the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.

3. The writ petition is disposed of in above terms.

Pending   miscellaneous   applications,   if   any,   also   stand disposed of.

Copy dasti.

                                 r         to

                                                                (Surya Kant)
                                                                Chief Justice  
        



                                                            (Ajay Mohan Goel)
                                                                      Judge




    December 20, 2018





                     ( rajni )  





                                                     ::: Downloaded on - 21/12/2018 22:56:30 :::HCHP