Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Raijibhai Chhotabhai Patel vs Executive Engineer, Mseb on 3 February, 2012

  
 
 
 
 
 
 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
  
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

STATE CONSUMER
    DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
    
   
    
     
     

CIRCUIT BENCH
    AT NAGPUR
    
   
    
     
     

5 TH FLOOR,
    ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
    
   
    
     
     

CIVIL LINES,
    NAGPUR-440 001
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

First Appeal
      No. A/01/606
      
     
      
       
       

(Arisen out
      of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

1.

Raijibhai Chhotabhai Patel R/o Rail Toly,Gondia,Dist.Gondia Vs.

1. Executive Engineer, MSEB Gondia

2. Chief Engineer, mseb, 4TH floor Prakash Garh, Bandra, East Mumbai

3. Chairman MSEB, Prakash Garh, Bandra, East Mumbai

4. Supentindent Engineer, MSEB O&M Circle, Admn.Building, Nagpur Road, Bhandara 04   BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER   HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER   PRESENT:
None ......for the Appellant   Adv.Quazi ......for the Respondent ORDER Appellant Raijibhai Patel is absent. Adv.Quazi appeared for Respondent and filed memo of appearance. As both parties were absent since long notice was issued to both of them and in response to the notice, Respondent appeared through Adv.Quazi. One Ravishankar appeared for the appellant and submitted that appellant Raijibhai is dead and his son has sent him. He has further submitted that he is serving with the sons of appellant. He submitted that sons of appellant are not aware about this appeal. The record reflects that Adv.Bapat has filed this appeal for appellant Raijibhai. But his VP does not bear his signature. Anyhow, it is obvious from the submission of Ravishankar that the appellant has died and his LRs are not interested to proceed with the appeal. Hence the appeal deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 
No order as to costs.  
Delivered on 03/02/2012      [ Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] MEMBER   [ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER