Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Subramani vs The District Collector on 6 August, 2024

                                                                    W.P.Nos.21983 & 21987of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED :06.08.2024

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

                                          W.P No.21983 and 21987 of 2024

                 S.Subramani                               ...Petitioner in W.P.No.21983 of
                 2024
                 S.Munisamy                              ...Petitioner in W.P.No.21987 of 2024
                                                       Vs.

                 1.The District Collector
                   Krishnagiri District

                 2.The Tahsildar
                   Krishnagiri Taluk
                   Krishnagiri-635 001                ..Respondents in both W.P.'s
                 PRAYER in W.P.No.21983 of 2024Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
                 Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,directing the
                 respondents to make appropriate entries in compute patta, Chitta and Village
                 A-Register extract based on the D.Namuna dated 27.02.2006 issued to the
                 petitioner with respect to the property in Neralagiri village in S.No.92/9 Dry
                 HA.0.41.0 and S.No.92/11 Dry.HA.0.18.5 within a time frame by this Court
                 based on the petitioner's representation dated 16.10.2023.


                 PRAYER in W.P.No.21987 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
                 the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the

                 1/5



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        W.P.Nos.21983 & 21987of 2024

                 respondents to make appropriate entries in compute patta, Chitta and Village
                 A-Register extract based on the D.Namuna dated 27.02.2006 issued to the
                 petitioner with respect to the property in Neralagiri village in S.No.92/12 Dry
                 HA.0.41.0 within a time frame by this Court based on the petitioner's
                 representation dated 16.10.2023.

                           For Petitioner in both W.P.'s    : Mr.S.Viswanathan
                                                              for M/s.Dass and Viswa Associates

                           For Respondents 1 & 2 in both W.P's : Mr.Arasakumar
                                                                 Government Advocate


                                                COMMON O R D E R


The petitioner in both the writ petitions seeks a direction to respondents to enter the name of the petitioner in Village A-Register and other revenue records based on the D.Namuna dated 27.02.2006 issued to the petitioner.

2.According to the petitioners, they have been assigned with the lands with an extent of 1.50 acres each in Survey Nos.92/9, 92/11 and 92/12 in Neralagiri Village, Krishnagiri Taluk by D.Namuna dated 27.02.2006.

3. The petitioners have been paying necessary tax to the Government and they have been in possession and enjoyment of the property assigned.

However, their names have not been entered in the revenue records, Village A-

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.21983 & 21987of 2024 Register, Patta and Chitta. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a written representation to the respondents on 16.10.2023 seeking entry of their name in the revenue records based on the assignment patta issued in their favour. The said representation has not been considered by the respondents. Hence, the petitioners have come before this Court by way of writ petition.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation of the petitioners will be considered in accordance with law within a time fixed by this Court.

5. In view of the assertion made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, is inclined to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 16.10.2023 and pass final orders on merits within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.21983 & 21987of 2024

6. . With the above directions, both the writ petitions are disposed of.

No costs.





                 06.08.2024

                 Index        : Yes/No
                 Internet     : Yes/No

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No nr To

1.The District Collector Krishnagiri District

2.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk Krishnagiri-635 001 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.21983 & 21987of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

nr W.P No.21983 and 21987 of 2024 06.08.2024 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis