Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ram Gopal Bhabar vs Panchayat Raj And Rural Development ... on 16 May, 2019

                                                           1                               WP-29413-2018
                                   The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                              WP-29413-2018
                             (RAM GOPAL BHABAR Vs PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)

                       3
                       Indore, Dated : 16-05-2019
                              Parties through their counsel.
                              The record reflects that the matter was listed twice before the Principal
                      Registrar and yet the reply has not been filed, therefore, right to file the reply
                      has been deemed to be closed and the matter is treated ripe for hearing as per
                      provisions of Chapter V Rule 1(1)(cc) of M.P.High Court Rules, 2008.

                             Counsel for State prays for further time to file the reply.
                             In view of the aforesaid and in the interest of justice learned counsel for
                      the respondents/State is granted further four weeks time to file the reply

subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- by the respondents to the petitioner, as the right has already been closed by the Principal Registrar.

List thereafter.

Interim relief to continue till the next date of hearing.

(PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA) JUDGE RJ Digitally signed by Reena Joseph Date: 16/05/2019 15:46:27