Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Mohan Rao S/O. Sri. S K Lakshman Rao vs Sharanabasava Boreddy on 29 January, 2013

Author: Anand Byrareddy

Bench: Anand Byrareddy

                         1




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
           CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

      DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

                      BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

          CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5988/2010


BETWEEN:

1.    SRI MOHAN RAO
      S/O. SRI. S K LAKSHMAN RAO
      AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
      R/A NO. 22, IST 'A' CROSS,
      HANUMANTHANAGAR,
      OPPOSITE TO STATE BANK OF MYSORE,
      BANGALORE -560 019.         ... PETITIONER

(By Sri SANJAY A PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.    SHARANABASAVA BOREDDY
      AGE: 23 YEARS
      S/O SRI. SIDDALINGAPPA BOREDDY
      AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
      C/O. PRINCIPAL,
      HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
      YERMARUS CAMPUS,
      RAICHUR 584 101.
                         2




2.   RATNA S
     D/O. SRI. S SAIBBA
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

3.   SWETHA PATIL
     D/O. SRI. H RAJASHEKAR PATIL
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

4.   YOGITHA
     D/O SRI. MUKESHCHAND AGARWAL
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

5.   CHAITANYAPRIYA
     D/O. SRI. G THIMMAREDDY
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

6.   USHA A
     D/O SRI. A CHANNAPPA PATIL
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
                        3




     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

7.   JUNAID ABBAS
     S/O. SRI. MD. SALEEM
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

8.   MHD. IMRAN
     S/O SRI. MD. YAKUB
     AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

9.   AZHAR ASHFAQ MOHIUDDIN
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
     S/O. SRI. KAISER RAZAK MOHIUDDIN
     C/O. PRINCIPAL,
     HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
     YERMARUS CAMPUS,
     RAICHUR 584 101.

10. CHANDRASHEKAR S
    S/O. SRI. RAMALINGAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
    C/O. PRINCIPAL,
    HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
    YERMARUS CAMPUS,
                          4




      RAICHUR 584 101.

11. SYED SHARFUDDIN
    S/O. SRI. SYED SHAMSUDDIN
    AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
    C/O. PRINCIPAL,
    HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
    YERMARUS CAMPUS,
    RAICHUR 584 101.

12.   SHIVAKUMAR
      S/O. SRI. BASANAGOUDA PATIL
      AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
      C/O. PRINCIPAL,
      HKE'S S.L.N. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
      YERMARUS CAMPUS,
      RAICHUR 584 101.


13. SRI. R A NARAYAN
    PRESIDENT, TALGEA
    NO. 23, 5TH MAIN,
    J C INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT,
    YELECHENAHALLI,
    KANAKAPURA ROAD,
    BANGALORE -560 062.      .. RESPONDENTS

(By Sri SHIVKUMAR MALIPATIL, ADV.,)

    THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FIELD UNDER
SECTION 482 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CODE,   1973   PRAYING    TO   SET    ASIDE
PROCEEDINGS     IN   EXECUTION     PETITION
NO.7/2009  ON    THE   FILE  OF    DISTRICT
CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM AT RAICHUR
                                5




(ARISING OUT OF DCFR NO.49/2008     DATED
30.12.2008) PERTAINING TO THIS PETITIONER
ONLY WHO IS A STRANGER AND NOT A PARTY TO
THE COMPLAINT AND EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS
AS PER ANNEXURE-A.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                           ORDER

The learned Counsel Shri Sanjay A Patil appearing for the petitioner would submit that there is a conflict of interest as he had filed vakalath for the petitioner before he was appointed as the Additional State Public Prosecutor and has by inadvertence, failed to take steps to intimate the petitioner to engage other counsel and there is no other counsel on record. Hence, he seeks time to take steps to inform the petitioner of the present circumstance to enable him to engage some other counsel.

2. This is an unfortunate circumstance. The moment Shri Sajay A Patil was appointed as the Additional State Public Prosecutor, he was duty bound and it was his responsibility to 6 ensure that he returned all the briefs in which he was appearing for the accused against the State and that not having been done, it is not open for Shri Patil to contend that he would now take steps, when the matter is listed before the court for final hearing. Therefore, it is taken that he no longer represents the petitioner. Since none appears for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE nv