Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 31]

Bombay High Court

Horizon Co-Operative Housing Society ... vs The Income Tax Officer Range-21(1)(4) ... on 21 January, 2020

Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, Milind N. Jadhav

                                                                                    24. os itxa 1696-17.doc

R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                          O.O.C.J.

                                 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1696 OF 2017


                      Horizon Co-operative Housing Society Ltd               ..   Appellant

                                Versus
                      The Income Tax Officer, Range -21(1)(4), Mumbai        ..   Respondent

                                                  ...................
                       Mr. Niraj Sheth i/by Jay Bhansali for the Appellant
                       Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Pritesh Chatterjee for the Respondent
                                                       ...................

                                              CORAM         : UJJAL BHUYAN &
                                                                 MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
                                              DATE         :     JANUARY 21, 2020.

                      P.C.:

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench "H", Mumbai in Income Tax Appeal No. 1760/Mum/2017 for the assessment year 2013-14.

3. Short point of controversy in this appeal is as to whether a Co-operative bank registered under the provision 1 of 2

24. os itxa 1696-17.doc of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 can be construed to be a "Co-operative society" for the purpose of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. In this connection, learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance on a decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Hubli Vs. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society1.

4. Let this appeal be admitted on the following substantial question of law:-

" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in not holding that the appellant was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of income of Rs. 1,23,30,631/- derived by way of interest from investment in a Saraswant Co-operative Bank?"

5. Mr. Sham Walve, the learned counsel waives service for the respondent.





           [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]                       [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
           Digitally signed
           by Ravindra M.
Ravindra   Amberkar
M.         Date:
           2020.01.23
Amberkar   15:22:10
           +0530




           1    [2017] 392 ITR 74 (Karnataka)


                                                                                         2 of 2