Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Jharkhand High Court

Shakil Ahmad Alias Sonu Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 November, 2016

Author: Ratnaker Bhengra

Bench: Ratnaker Bhengra

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                                         B.A. No. 7940 of 2016


                 Shakil Ahmad @ Sonu Khan @ Sonu Ansari @ Sonu S/o Late  Fujain Khan R/o 
                 Village Jhalua P.O., P.S. & District Garhwa.      ­----- Petitioner
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Jharkhand                                                     ------- Opposite Party
                        CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
                  For the Petitioner                          :        Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate
                 For the O.P.                                 :        A.P.P.

                                                          ­­­­­­­­­­­­­
 05/09.11

.2016

1. Bail application has been filed on behalf of petitioner namely   Shakil Ahmad  @ Sonu Khan @ Sonu Ansari @ Sonu  who is in custody in connection with Garhwa  P.S. Case No. 41 of 2016 corresponding to G.R.Case no. 143 of 2016, S.T. No. 130  of 2016 for the offence registered U/Ss. 395 and 412 IPC

2. Learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   has   submitted   that   petitioner   is   not  named in the F.I.R. and also no T.I.P. was held. He has further stated that seizure  witnesses   have   also   stated   that   nothing   was   recovered   or   seized   from   the  possession of the petitioner. Moreover, two co­accused persons namely Chandu  @ Mehandi Hassan and Samir Alam @ Samim have been granted bail vide order  dated 8.6.2016 and 10.6.2016 passed in B.A. Nos. 4664 of 2016 and 4953 of  2016 , hence, petitioner may be released on bail.  

3. Learned A.P. P. has opposed the prayer for bail. 

4. Having   heard   counsel   for   both   sides   and   looking   to   the   facts   and  circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner  on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/­(Twenty Thousand only) with  two  sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge­ VII, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case no. 41 of 2016 corresponding  to G.R. Case  no. 143 of 2016, S.T. No. 130 of 2016.    

                                                                                                      (Ratnaker Bhengra, J.) Nibha/