Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Union of India - Act

The Prevention of Money-laundering (Restoration of Confiscated Property) Rules, 2016

UNION OF INDIA
India

The Prevention of Money-laundering (Restoration of Confiscated Property) Rules, 2016

Rule 0 of 2016

  • Published on 26 September 2016
  • Commenced on 26 September 2016
  • [This is the version of this document from 26 September 2016.]
  • [Note: The original publication document is not available and this content could not be verified.]
The Prevention of Money-laundering (Restoration of Confiscated Property) Rules, 2016Published vide Notification No. G.S.R. 913 (E), dated 26th September, 2016Last Updated 14th January, 2019Ministry of Finance(Department of Revenue)G.S.R. 913 (E). - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (x) of subsection (2) of section 73, read with sub-section (8) of section 8 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely:-

1. Short title and commencement.

(1)These rules may be called the Prevention of Money-laundering (Restoration of Confiscated Property) Rules, 2016.
(2)They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. Definitions.

- In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a)"Act" means the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003);
(b)"claimant" means a person who has acted in good faith and has suffered a quantifiable loss as a result of the offense of Money-laundering despite having taken all reasonable precautions, and is not involved in the offense of money-laundering;
(c)Words and expressions used in these rules and not defined but defined in the Act, shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them the Act.

3. Manner for restoration of confiscated property.

(1)The Special Court, within forty-five days from the date of passing the order of confiscation under sub-section (5) section 8 of the Act in respect of property, shall cause to be published a notice in two daily newspapers, one in English language and one in vernacular language, having sufficient circulation in the locality where the property is situated calling upon the claimants, who claim to have a legitimate interest in such property or part thereof, to submit and establish their claims, if any, for obtaining restoration of such property or part thereof.
(2)When the confiscated property is insufficient to meet the loss suffered by the claimants as a result of the offense of money-laundering, the Special Court, as it thinks fit, may pass an order of restoration of property on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the share of loss suffered by each claimant.
(3)No claimant shall be entitled to claim restoration of confiscated property before the Special Court beyond thirty days from the date of publication of the notice referred to in sub-rule (1):Provided that the Special Court may entertain any claim not exceeding further thirty days, upon the satisfaction that the claimant was prevented by sufficient cause.

3A. [ Manner of restoration of property during trial. [Inserted by Notification No. G.S.R. 23(E), dated 11.1.2019 (w.e.f. 26.9.2016).]

(1)The Special Court, after framing of the charge under section 4 of the Act, on the basis of an application moved for restoration of a property attached under sub-section (1) of section 5, or, seized or frozen under section 17 or section 18 of the Act prior to confiscation, if it thinks fit, may, for the purposes of the second proviso to sub-section (8) of section 8 of the Act, cause to be published a notice in two daily newspapers, one in English language and one in vernacular language, having sufficient circulation in the locality where such property is situated calling upon the claimants, who claim to have a legitimate interest in such property or part thereof, to submit and establish their claims, if any, for obtaining restoration of such property or part thereof.
(2)When the property referred to in sub-rule (1) is insufficient to meet the loss suffered by the claimant as a result of the offence of money-laundering, the Special Court, as it thinks fit, may pass an order of restoration of property directing the Central Government, if necessary, to auction such property and disburse on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the share of loss suffered by each claimant and may give custody thereof to such claimant on his executing a bond undertaking to produce such restored property before the Special Court as and when required for the purposes of sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) or sub-section (7) of section 8 of the Act.
(3)No claimant shall be entitled to claim restoration of the property referred in sub-rule (1) before the Special Court beyond thirty days from the date of publication of the notice referred to in that sub-rule:Provided that the Special Court may entertain any claim not exceeding further thirty days, upon the satisfaction that the claimant was prevented by sufficient cause.
(4)No restoration order shall be passed by the Special Court under this rule, without giving an opportunity of being heard to the owner of the property referred to in sub-rule (1) or in the event of his death, the legal representatives of such person or official assignee or official receiver, as the case may be.]

4. Interpretation.

- If any question arises relating to the interpretation of these rules, the matter shall be referred to the Central Government.