Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

BLAPL/8839/2017 on 9 May, 2018

Author: S. K. Sahoo

Bench: S. K. Sahoo

                                     BLAPL No.8839 of 2017




05. 09.05.2018                Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
                 learned counsel for the State.
                              This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
                 in connection with G.R. Case No.121 of 2017 arising out of
                 Badambadi P.S. Case No.285 of 2017 pending in the Court
                 of learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Cuttack for offences
                 punishable under sections 376(2)(n)/323/294 of the Indian
                 Penal Code read with section 6 of the POCSO Act and
                 section 67 of the Information Technology Act.
                              The petitioner moved an application for bail
                 before the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge -cum-
                 Presiding Officer, Children's Court, Cuttack which was
                 rejected on 20.11.2017.
                              Learned counsel for the State earlier sought for
                 time to take instruction relating to the result of the
                 examination of the mobile phone containing some video
                 which was sent to CFSL, Kolkata. Learned counsel for the
                 State today produced letter written by the IIC, Badambadi
                 police station dated 6.4.2018 which indicates that the report
                 from the CFSL, Kolkata has not been received. Charge sheet
                 has already been submitted on 02.02.2018 under sections
                 376(2)(n)/323/294/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with
                 section 6 of POCSO Act and section 67 of the Information
                 Technology Act. The petitioner is in judicial custody since
                 29.10.2017. After perusing the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the
                 victim and other materials available on record, I am inclined
                 to release the petitioner on bail.
                              Let the petitioner be released on bail in the
                                2




        aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees
        twenty thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount
        to the satisfaction for the Court in seisin over the matter with
        further terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem
        just and proper.
                     Accordingly, the BLAPL is disposed of.
                     Urgent certified copy of this order be granted
        on proper application.
                                             .......................
                                             S. K. Sahoo, J.

sisir 3 4 5