Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ani Technologies Private Limited vs Union Of India on 6 August, 2025

Author: M. S. Sonak

Bench: M. S. Sonak

                               Sayyed                                                 925-WP(L).18561.2025.docx



                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                  WRIT PETITION (L) NO.18561 OF 2025

                               ANI Technologies Private Limited            ...Petitioner
                                     Versus
                               Union of India & Anr.                       ...Respondents
                                    _____________________________________________________
                               Mr. Rohan Shan, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Ms. Vidushi
                               Maheshwari, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Ms. Daliya Singh i/by DMD Advocates
                               for the Petitioner.
                               Ms. Shruti Vyas a/w Ms. Niyati Mankad (through VC) & Ms. Priyanka
                               Singh for Respondent No.2.
                                     _____________________________________________________
                                                                CORAM : M. S. Sonak &
                                                                        Jitendra Jain, JJ.

DATED : 6 August 2025 PC.:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Ms. Vyas, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 seeks two weeks time to respond to the issue raised in this petition.
3. She says that reply will be filed and served by 26 August 2025. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed and served by 4 September 2025. List the matter on 10 September 2025 for further consideration.
4. Mr. Shah submits that the show cause notice in this case was issued on 12 May 2020 and the impugned order has been made on 28 February 2025. He points out that this is way beyond the maximum prescribed period of limitation in Section 73(4B) of the Finance Act, 1994.
5. Accordingly, until the next date, we direct that no coercive steps should be taken for enforcement of the impugned order.
                                        (Jitendra Jain, J.)                         (M. S. Sonak, J.)
Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
                                                                 Page 1 of 1
Date: 07/08/2025 11:18:04