Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

J. Anthony Mary @ Monica vs Sujatha on 22 January, 2020

Author: P. Rajamanickam

Bench: P. Rajamanickam

                                                          1


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 22.01.2020

                                                       CORAM:

                                THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM

                                          CRL.O.P.No.26423 of 2019
                                                     and
                                          CRL.M.P No.14124 of 2019

                      J. Anthony Mary @ Monica                         .. Petitioner/Accused

                                                        -Vs-
                      Sujatha                                    ..Respondent/Complainant


                      Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of

                      Criminal Procedure Code, to withdraw the STC.No.199 of 2019

                      pending for issue of service on the file of the II Judicial Magistrate,

                      Ponneri and transfer the same to any other competent court in

                      Chennai District, more particularly V Additional Family Court, at

                      Chennai District.

                                      For Petitioner    : Mr.N.Easwaran

                                      For Respondent     : Mr.J. Agni Selvaraju


                                                       ORDER

This Criminal original Petition has been filed by the accused under Section 407 Cr.P.C., to transfer the case in STC.No.199 of 2019 from the file of the Judicial Magistrate II, Ponneri, to the file of http://www.judis.nic.in 2 V Additional Family Court, Chennai District.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner's husband is a practicing advocate at High Court Madras. He further submitted that the petitioner's husband himself told the petitioner that he has illicit extra marital relationship with the respondent since 2013 and based on the said statement, the petitioner has filed IDOP.No.4801 of 2018 on the file of the V- Additional Family Court, Chennai, on the ground of adultery. He further submitted that after service of notice in IDOP, the respondent herein entered appearance and filed counter and thereafter, she filed a private complaint alleging that the petitioner has committed offence under Sections 500 and 501 IPC and based on the same, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II Ponneri, has taken the case on file in STC.No.199 of 2019. He further submitted that since IDOP.No.4801 of 2019 is pending on the file of the V Additional Family Court, Chennai, the case in STC.No.199 of 2019 also may be transferred to the V Additional Family Court, Chennai.

3. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the Family Court cannot try the criminal case. He further submitted that the respondent/complainant and the witnesses are residing only within the jurisdiction of Judicial http://www.judis.nic.in 3 Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, and hence if the case is transfered to some other court, that would cause prejudice to the respondent and therefore, he prayed to dismiss the petition.

4. Admittedly, the case in STC.No.199 of 2019 is a Criminal Case and the same is pending before the Judicial Magistrate No.II Ponneri. The petitioner requests to transfer the said case to the V Additional Family Court. At this juncture, it would be relevant to refer to Section 10 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 which reads thus:

''10. Procedure generally.-
(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) and of any other law for the time being in force shall apply to the suits and proceedings [other than the proceedings under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)] before a Family Court and for the purposes of the said provisions of the Code, a Family Court shall be deemed to be a civil court and shall have all the powers of such court.
(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the http://www.judis.nic.in rules, the provisions of the Code of Criminal 4 Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or the rules made thereunder, shall apply to the proceedings under Chapter IX of that Code before a Family Court.
(3) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall prevent a Family Court from laying down its own procedure with a view to arrive at a settlement in respect of the subject-matter of the suit or proceedings or at the truth of the facts alleged by the one party and denied by the other.''

5. From the aforesaid provision, it is clear that the Family Court shall be deemed to be a Civil Court other than the proceedings under Chapter-IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973. The provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure will apply only in respect of the proceedings under Chapter IX of Criminal Procedure, i.e., only in respect of maintenance cases. Hence, the Criminal Case cannot be transferred to the Family Court.

6. For the aforesaid reasons, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.01.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in 5 Index :Yes/No gv Note: Issue order copy on 28.01.2020 To

1. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Kattoor Police Station, Coimbatore.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3. The II Judicial Magistrate, Ponneri.

http://www.judis.nic.in 6 P. RAJAMANICKAM., J.

gv CRL.O.P.No.26423 of 2019 and CRL.M.P No.14124 of 2019 22.01.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in