Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Umesh S/O. Zumbarlal Nahar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 October, 2019

Author: V. K. Jadhav

Bench: V. K. Jadhav

                                                                         aba803.19-
                                       -1-


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

              ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.803 OF 2019

                          UMESH S/O ZUMBERLAL NAHAR
                                    VERSUS
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

                                 WITH
            3 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.804 OF 2019

                         PUNAM W/O. RAM DONGARE
                                     VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                        .....
                  Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shinde Ganesh P.
                  APP for Respondent-State : Smt. Rashmi Gour
                                        .....

                                             CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.
                                             DATED : 11 th OCTOBER, 2019

 PER COURT:-


 1.       The applicants in both the Anticipatory Bail Applications are

 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with crime No. 206 of 2019

 registered with Gangapur police station, District Aurangabad (Rural)

 for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC, under sections

 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and under Sections

 8, 2(h), 9, 19(a), 19(c)(ii), 21, 35, 19(c)(v), 19(c)(vi) and 19(c)(vii) of

 the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985. Their applications bearing Bail

 Application Nos. 104 of 2019 and 105 of 2019 with similar prayer

 came to be rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,

 Vaijapur, District Aurangabad vide orders dated 17.06.2019.



 2.       Heard both sides.


::: Uploaded on - 11/10/2019                     ::: Downloaded on - 12/10/2019 06:09:28 :::
                                                                       aba803.19-
                                    -2-



 3.       On going through the order dated 18.2.2016 passed by the

 Hon'ble Division Bench (Coram: A. S. Oka and C. V. Bhadang, JJ.)

 at the Principal Seat at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 4076 of 2014 and

 pursuant to the said order, the Government Resolution issued by the

 Government of Maharashtra dated 3.10.2017, prima facie, I do not

 think that the allegations as against the applicants attract the

 provisions of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and the provisions of

 the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. So far as the charge under

 Section 420 of I.P.C. is concerned, during the course of argument,

 the label of the said commodity which is the subject matter of the

 present crime has been shown to me in the Court and on perusal of

 the same, it appears that the same pertains to the natural potash as

 clearly mentioned on the label. Though learned A.P.P. has strongly

 submitted that the agriculturists have purchased the same under the

 misconception that it is a fertilizer, the applicant cannot be held

 responsible for the same. There is no bar to sell natural potash from

 a fertilizer shop and particularly when it is clearly mentioned on the

 label that it is natural potash and not a fertilizer. In the given set of

 allegations, prima facie, I do not think that Section 420 of I.P.C. is

 attracted. Thus, considering the entire aspects of the case, I am

 inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in both the

 Anticipatory Bail Applications on certain conditions. Hence the

 following order:-




::: Uploaded on - 11/10/2019                  ::: Downloaded on - 12/10/2019 06:09:28 :::
                                                                            aba803.19-
                                        -3-

                                    ORDER

I. Both the Anticipatory Bail Applications are hereby allowed.

II. In the event of arrest, the applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 803 of 2019 viz. UMESH S/O ZUMBERLAL NAHAR, and the applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 804 of 2019 viz. PUNAM W/O. RAM DONGARE in connection with crime No. 206 of 2019 registered with Gangapur police station, District Aurangabad (Rural) for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC, under sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and under Sections 8, 2(h), 9, 19(a), 19(c)(ii), 21, 35, 19(c)(v), 19(c)(vi) and 19(c)(vii) of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.15,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount on following conditions:-

a) The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
b) The applicants shall make themselves available as and when required by the Investigating Officer in carrying out further investigation into the crime, if any.

III. Both the Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/ ::: Uploaded on - 11/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 12/10/2019 06:09:28 :::