Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court

The Orissa Minerals Development Co. ... vs The Principal Commr. Of I.T. Kol.2 on 20 July, 2016

Author: Dipankar Datta

Bench: Dipankar Datta

                                  ORDER SHEET
                                  WP 722/2016

                         IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                       Constitutional Writ    Jurisdiction

                                 ORIGINAL SIDE




                 THE ORISSA MINERALS DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.& ANR.

                                     Versus

                THE PRINCIPAL COMMR. OF I.T. KOL.2, KOL. & ORS.


    BEFORE:

    The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

    Date : 20th July, 2016.


  Mr. N.K. Poddar, Sr. Adv. Appears with Mr. D. Mitra, Adv. And Mr. V. Tibrewal,
                                                           Adv. For petitioners.

                               Mr. S.B. Saraf, Adv. Appears for the respondents.

The Court : Having heard Mr. Poddar, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners, and Mr. Saraf, learned Advocate appearing for the respondents, and considering the fact that an appeal is pending before the respondent no.4 in respect of the assessment year 2008-09, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the said respondent to proceed in accordance with law for disposal of the appeal as early as possible, preferably within eight weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to his convenience,.

There shall be stay of the impugned determination till such time the respondent no.4 considers the appeal for the first time. However, at the first hearing of the appeal by the respondent no.4, the petitioners shall be entitled to seek extension of stay by making an appropriate application. 2

It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed on merits of the petitioner's claim and that all the points are kept open for being urged before the respondent no.4. It is also made abundantly clear that the petitioners shall cooperate with the respondent no.4 to give effect to this order for early disposal of the appeal and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment.

The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of without order for costs.

(DIPANKAR DATTA, J.) tk