Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Budh Ram vs Pspcl And Anr on 14 July, 2017

Author: Jaspal Singh

Bench: Jaspal Singh

CWP No. 15150 of 2017                                                  --1--


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                   AT CHANDIGARH

                                               CWP No. 15150 of 2017
                                               DECIDED ON: July 14, 2017


BUDH RAM                                                   .....PETITIONER..


                                   VERSUS


PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. .....RESPONDENTS..
AND ANOTHER



CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:   Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate
           for the petitioner.

           *****

JASPAL SINGH, J (ORAL)

By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant him the benefit of 23 year advance promotional increments w.e.f. 01.01.2015 as per policy under Finance Circulars 17/1990 dated 23.04.1990 amended from time to time, with consequential re- fixation of pay and retiral benefits and to release the arrears of revised pay and retiral benefits along with interest @ 12% p.a.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a legal notice dated 02.06.2017 (Annexure P-5) was duly served upon the respondents, but till date, no action has been taken.

3. Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent(s) to 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 18-07-2017 01:54:05 ::: CWP No. 15150 of 2017 --2--

look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his legal notice dated 02.06.2017 (Annexure P-5) and to decide the same, particularly keeping in view policy under Finance Circulars No. 17/1990, Office order No.197/Fin/PRC- 1988, dated 23.04.1990, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

July 14, 2017                                           (JASPAL SINGH)
sonika                                                       JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned          Yes

Whether reportable                 Yes/No




                                         2 of 2
                    ::: Downloaded on - 18-07-2017 01:54:06 :::