Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Nirmal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd vs Macrotech Developers Ltd on 28 July, 2021

Author: A. K. Menon

Bench: A. K. Menon

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                       IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION


                          COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.370 OF 2021
                                                     WITH

                          COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.371 OF 2021


              Nirmal Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd.                   .. Petitioner
                         v/s.
              Macrotech Developers Ltd.                        .. Respondent




              Mr. Ashok Paranjpe a/w Vishal Jathar i/b. MDP Partners for the
              petitioner.

              Mr. Vivek Vashi a/w Ms. Anusha Jegadeesh, Ankit Pathak i/b. Vashi &
              Vashi for the respondent.


                                                         CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.

DATED : 28TH JULY, 2021. (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) P.C. :

1. Petition No.370 of 2021 is seeking post award relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The award is dated 26 th December, 2020. The award is subject matter of challenge in Commercial Arbitration Petition no.371 of 2021. That petition is Digitally signed by SANDHYA not on board today.

SANDHYA BHAGU BHAGU WADHWA 1/3 WADHWA Date:

2021.07.29 18:21:52 +0530
1.CARBP-370-21.doc wadhwa
2. The learned counsel for both the parties state that their disputes have been settled out of court and that the consent terms may be taken on record and both petitions may be allowed to be withdrawn. They wish to file consent terms only to place on record, the steps taken by them in compliance with the Award. In that sense, there is no challenge that survives today.
3. The signatories to the consent terms are the Chairman of the petitioner and authorized signatory of the respondent. Both have been authorized by resolutions. They are both present on this Video Conference. Both signatories confirm having executed the consent terms and the annexures.
4. Accordingly, at the request of the parties, I pass the following order;

(i) By consent, Commercial Arbitration Petition no.371 of 2021 is taken on board.

(ii) Consent Terms tendered by the learned Advocates are taken on record and is marked "X" for identification.

(iii) It is made clear that the court has merely taken the consent terms on record. No order is being passed in terms of the consent 2/3

1.CARBP-370-21.doc wadhwa terms.

(iv) Both petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed as such.

(v) All interim applications shall accordingly be infructuous and stand disposed.

(vi) No costs.

(A. K. MENON, J.) 3/3

1.CARBP-370-21.doc wadhwa