Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Chhaganlal Jain, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-2(4), New Delhi on 28 August, 2020

            IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
            DELHI BENCH FRIDAY BENCH A: NEW DELHI

                       (Through Video Conferencing)

            BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT
                               AND
        SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                          ITA No. 6459/Del/2019
                         Assessment Year : 2011-12

     Shri Chhaganlal Jain,             Income Tax Officer,
     HD-44, Vishakha Enclave,          Ward 2(4),
     Pitampura,                        New Delhi.
     New Delhi-110034
     (PAN: ACVPJ6260C)
         (Appellant)                     (Respondent)


                             Appellant by: None
                           Respondent by: Shri Saras Kumar, Sr. DR
        Date of hearing       : 28.08.2020
        Date of pronouncement : 28.08.2020



                                  ORDER

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A),-1, New Delhi dated 28.5.2019 .

2. In the captioned appeal, the appellant assessee has informed that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax Vivad se ITA 6459/Del/2019 Assessment year 2011-12 Vishwas Act, 2020. It has been stated that the necessary declaration in accordance with Section 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee.

3. Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

4. However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 28th August, 2020.

       Sd/-                                            Sd/-

 (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA)                            (G.S. PANNU)
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                             VICE PRESIDENT


'GS'




                                        2
 ITA 6459/Del/2019
Assessment year 2011-12




Copy forwarded to: -

1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT


                                 By Order



                              Assistant Registrar




                          3