Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Puran Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 14 October, 2019

Author: Arun Monga

Bench: Arun Monga

CWP No.29266 of 2019 (O&M)                                 1

                                Sr. No.124

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                     AT CHANDIGARH

                                        CWP No.29266 of 2019 (O&M)
                                         Date of Decision: 14.10.2019

Puran Singh
                                                           ... Petitioner
                               Versus

State of Punjab and others

                                                        ... Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:- Mr. Harbans Lal Sharma, Advocate,
          for the petitioner.

       Ms. Ambika Bedi, AAG, Punjab.
ARUN MONGA, J.(ORAL)

Petitioner herein seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize his service, who has been working as driver for more than 20 years from the date of regularization of his juniors along with all consequential benefits arising therefrom.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court vide CWP No.18356 of 2014 decided on 16.04.2018 titled as Lakhwinder Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab and others (Annexure P-11).

3. In the premise, petitioner submitted a representation dated 05.07.2019 (Annexure P-13), but the same has not been adverted by the respondents. Hence, the writ petition.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15-10-2019 21:24:30 ::: CWP No.29266 of 2019 (O&M) 2

4. Notice of motion.

5. On advance service of the petition, Ms. Ambika Bedi, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the State.

6. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

7. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to objectively consider the representation dated 05.07.2019 (Annexure P-13) and also by keeping in view the contentions stated in the present writ petition by treating it as a supplementary representation and pass a speaking order in the light of judgment dated 16.04.2018, passed by this Court contained at Annexure P-11, in accordance with law.

8. Let the needful be done within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

9. Disposed of in above terms.




                                              (ARUN MONGA)
14.10.2019                                         JUDGE
vandana

Whether speaking/reasoned                      Yes/No
Whether Reportable                             Yes/No




                               2 of 2
            ::: Downloaded on - 15-10-2019 21:24:31 :::