Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Karnataka High Court

Shivamma W/O Laxmikanth vs Krishna Grameen Bank on 8 September, 2010

Author: Anand Byrareddy

Bench: Anand Byrareddy

RRAJAPUR ROAD-Vf: 
'g.GU'LBARGA. ~~ *

INTEHEHHHECOURT(HPKARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

DATED THIS '11-IE osm DAY OF SEPTEMB}E';.R;~« H
BEFORE    
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE    
WRIT PETITION No.8o694/29092'(s_§12EG)   " V'  
BETWEEN   V V     

SI-IIVAMMA
W/O. LAXMIKANTH  
AGED 49 YEARS    
0cc:sUEs1DARY STAFF".  E    
EN KRISHNA GRAM1EEN;?iAE*AAAK.    A 
HEAD OFFICE      A  A
R/O. PLOT NO_._5, PQGJ1;/§CC)LOI\W'«--  
NEAR BHAVANI'£EMfPLE'§:~K{ESHNOOR"ROAD
GULBARGA.       A y

 . A    .... ..PETITIONER
(BY SI-IRI P. VILAS KuNrAR",,Am:., )

KRISHNA  A BANK
THROUGH I'FSV'C}L"\IERE\xIAN

.. . . RESPONDENT

'{_BY_ SVHI§VE' 'A.M. NAGRAL. ADV, FOR SR1. RA. PATIL, ' g' \K/ rendered with respect to service law. The said decision deals with irregularly appointed employees, who may have continued in service by Virtue of interim dpirectlions issued by the Court and the learned _ draw specific attention to parag'ra:pl::.}'5'Il§ reported in the equivalent.,c'itatioh"

2607 at page 2687, "53. One aspect 'there may be cases _ A ' wheres ""itire;g§uiaE_"'e. {not illegal as fefilfpiaiiiied in S.V. ,(SU_Pl5lA;]:,i_-- f§'i,N;w* NANJUNDAPPA e..jNV.._"NAGARAJAN (SUPRA) and referredl'll't"oV--~iti*para"<1.5--above, of duly qualified persons inyV_.dt.tiylsahctioried vacant posts might _haVe°~..be'Cf1_'p._Ina.de'~~-"Rand the employees have continuedi--..tyo___wcrk for ten years or more but the intervention of orders of the Courts « The question of regularisation of the 'senifices of such employees may have to be co11s'1dered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this Court in the cases above referred to and in the light of this judgment. In that context, the Union of India,
-.\V and therefore, the petitioner shall be regularized, but, however without back--Wages. The petiti0n.e~r_l:'-ehaill however, be entitled to continuity of service-. ~ consequential benefits. The Comply with this order within .21 ;"pheri'r§d'lloft:'i--f. not earlier from the date of *1T:t)l'C1§lptl.C.)f.__E1'C§;l"flfi€£ClV"C0§5y of V the order.
J'"I'/-