Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Mr. A Rex vs Bangalore Electricity Supply on 4 December, 2020

Author: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

Bench: P.S. Dinesh Kumar

                                   1




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

           DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020

                               BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

         WRIT PETITION No.13825 OF 2020 (GM-KEB)

BETWEEN :

1.      MR. A. REX
        S/O MR. A. AROCKIASWAMY
        AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

2.      MRS. S. JENIFAR
        W/O MR. A. REX
        AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

        BOTH RESIDING AT FLAT NO.213
        2ND FLOOR, 'SASHANK ANUTHAM'
        BBMP WARD NO.9 (THINDLU)
        VIDYARANYAPURA SUB-DIVISION
        THINDLU VILLAGE
        YELAHANKA HOBLI
        BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
        BANGALORE-560 097                     ... PETITIONERS

(BY SHRI. H. MUJTABA, ADVOCATE)


AND :

1.      BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY
        COMPANY LIMITED, A WHOLLY OWNED
        GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
        UNDERTAKING CORPORATE OFFICE
        K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001
        REPRESENTED BY ITS
        MANAGING DIRECTOR

2.      THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE).,
        C, O AND M, HEBBAL DIVISION
        BESCOM, YELAHANKA
        BANGALORE-560 064
                                    2




3.    THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE).,
      C-9 SUB-DIVISION (B.V.CO)
      BESCOM, VIDYARANYAPURA
      BANGALORE-560 097

4.    M/S SASHANK CONSTRUCTIONS
      A PROPRIETORSHIP COMPANY
      HAVING IS OFFICE AT NO.52
      2ND MAIN, BHEL LAYOUT
      CHIKKABETTAHALLI
      VIDRANYAPURA POST
      BANGALORE-560 097
      REPRESENTED BY ITS
      PROPRIETOR
      MR. M. RAMESH                               ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI. H.V. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
    VIDE ORDER DATED 04.12.2020
    NOTICE TO R4 DISPENSED WITH)


      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS LEADING TO
THE ISSUANCE OF THE IMPUGNED COMMUNICATION DTD.29.07.2020 ISSUED
BY R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,


      THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                              ORDER

Shri.H.Mujtaba, learned advocate for petitioners submits that the petitioners are the co-owners of Flat No.213 in Sashank Anutham Apartment.

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer - BESCOM has issued a notice dated 29.07.2020 (Annexure-A) to the flat owners Association i.e., M/s. Sashank Anutham Apartment Residents 3 Association and also to the builder stating that the Occupancy Certificate produced by the builder was not genuine. Therefore, the builder has been called upon to produce authentic and genuine Occupancy Certificate within 15 days therefrom, failing which, the power supply shall be disconnected.

3. Shri.H.V.Devaraju, learned standing counsel for BESCOM submitted that since Occupancy Certificate was found to be fabricated one, the Assistant Executive Engineer has rightly called upon the builder to produce the genuine certificate.

4. Shri Devaraju further submitted that petitioners are the co-owners of Flat No.213. They may file their objections before the Assistant Executive Engineer (Ele), C-9, Sub-Division (B.V.Co), BESCOM, Vidyaranyapura, Bengaluru-560 097, and the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed, in accordance with law. Till disposal of their reply, the power supply shall not be disconnected subject to payment of regular consumption charges.

5. Shri Mujtaba, in reply, submitted that the requirement for producing Occupancy Certificate came into force with effect from 4 26.12.2018. Petitioners have been given power supply in the month of June, 2018. Therefore, notice itself is misconceived.

6. Undisputed facts of the case are, builder has produced an Occupancy Certificate. The BESCOM has found it to be fabricated. The petitioners are co-owners of the flat.

7. Shri Devaraju for BESCOM has fairly submitted that if the builder and the petitioners submit their reply before the third respondent, the same will be considered, in accordance with law. He has also assured that power supply shall not be disconnected in the meanwhile.

8. In the circumstances, in the opinion of this Court, it is just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition granting liberty to the petitioners to file their reply before the third respondent-Assistant Executive Engineer (Ele), C-9, Sub-Division (B.V.Co), BESCOM, Vidyaranyapura, Bengaluru - 560 097, within four weeks from today. If such reply is filed, the third respondent shall consider them, in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders. In the meanwhile, the power 5 supply shall not be disconnected subject to payment of regular consumption charges.

9. Petition disposed of. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

10. In view of disposal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2020 does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE AV