Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Ms.N.Sathish Kumar vs M/S.Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd on 27 November, 2020

Author: M.Sundar

Bench: M.Sundar

                                                                         O.P.No.247 of 2015


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                Dated : 27.11.2020
                                                      Coram
                                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
                                                O.P.No.247 of 2015

                      Ms.N.Sathish Kumar
                      Sri Murugan Motors and Earth Movers
                      No.593-1, NH 47, Gold Coins Avinashi Road
                      Civil Airodrome Post, Coimbatore
                      Pin- 641 014.                                    ... Petitioner
                                                          vs.
                      1. M/s.Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.,
                         Rep. by its Authorised Signatory
                         2nd Floor, 3 Dass India Tower
                         2nd Line Beach, Parrys
                         Chennai-600 001.

                      2. D.Saravanan
                         Sole Arbitrator
                         Orient Chambers
                         4th Floor, No.90/73, Armenian Street
                         Chennai-600 001.

                      3. Mr.D.Ravindhar
                         No.23A, East Car Street
                         Senda Palayam Post
                         Veerakeralam, Coimbatore
                         Pin-641 007.

                      4. Mr.S.C.Doraiswamy
                         No.23A, East Car Street
                         Senda Palayam Post
                         Veerakeralam, Coimbatore
                         Pin-641 007.                                ... Respondents


http://www.judis.nic.in
                      Page No.1/4
                                                                              O.P.No.247 of 2015


                           Original Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
                      Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the ex-parte award of the sole
                      Arbitrator / 2nd respondent passed in A.C.P.(Kotak) No.301 of 2011
                      dated 15.12.2014 as against the petitioner herein with costs.
                            For petitioner             : Mr.S.Saravanan
                            For Respondents            : Mr.Kiran Manokaran
                                                          for Mr.K.Moorthy for R1

                                                    ORDER

Captioned 'Original Petition' ('OP' for the sake of brevity) has been listed under the caption 'FOR REPORTING SETELEMENT'.

2. Mr.S.Saravanan, learned counsel on record for sole petitioner and Mr.Kiran Manokaran, learned counsel representing Mr.K.Moorthy, counsel on record for contesting first respondent are before me in this web hearing on a video conferencing platform.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo dated 19.11.2020 enclosing 'One Time Settlement offer' ['OTS' for the sake of convenience and clarity] from contesting first respondent, photo copies of demand draft paid by sole petitioner pursuant to OTS and more importantly, a communication dated 19.11.2020 from the contesting first respondent wherein, contesting first respondent has confirmed that payment pursuant to OTS has been received by way of demand draft towards full and final settlement of the loan account. This memo with http://www.judis.nic.in Page No.2/4 O.P.No.247 of 2015 enclosures shall be annexed to this order and shall form part of this order. Scanned copy of letter/receipt dated 19.11.2020 of contesting first respondent is as follows:

http://www.judis.nic.in Page No.3/4 O.P.No.247 of 2015 M.SUNDAR.J., mk
4. Aforementioned learned counsel on both sides submit in unison that the impugned award now stands fully satisfied in terms of OTS and therefore, nothing survives in captioned OP. This common submission of both learned counsel is recorded and captioned OP is disposed of as closed recording the above narrative. There shall be no order as to costs.
27.11.2020 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No mk O.P.No.247 of 2015 http://www.judis.nic.in Page No.4/4