Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Legal Heirs And Representatives Of Decd vs National Insurance Company Ltd & ... on 16 March, 2017

Author: A.G.Uraizee

Bench: A.G.Uraizee

                 C/MCA/1000/2016                                                ORDER




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR MODIFICATION OF
                         ORDER) NO. 1000 of 2016

                   In CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10530 of 2012
                       In FIRST APPEAL NO. 3051 of 2012

         =========================================
                LEGAL HEIRS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF DECD.
                      HITENDRASINH UDAJI....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus
           NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & 3....Opponent(s)
         =========================================
         Appearance:
         MR ANKIT SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 1.2
         MR.J S SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 1.2
         MR NAGESH C SOOD, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
         =========================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
                         Date : 16/03/2017

                                      ORAL ORDER

Rule. Mr Nagesh Sood, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent no.1. Presence of other respondents is not required for the disposal of this application.

2 I have heard Mr Ankit Shah, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr Nagesh Sood, learned advocate for the respondent no.1.

3 The present application is preferred for modification and correction of order dated 31st January, 2013 passed in Civil Application No.10530 of 2012 in First Appeal No.3051 of 2012 whereby due to inadvertence it is recorded that the respondent no.1-insurance company has already deposited the awarded amount along with proportionate costs to the tune of Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Mon Aug 14 12:53:42 IST 2017 C/MCA/1000/2016 ORDER Rs.50,776/- before the Tribunal concerned. The amount recorded is by mistake which should be Rs.13,58,582/-.

3 It appears that the mistake has crept in due to inadvertence which is required to be corrected.

4 For the foregoing reasons, this application is allowed. The order dated 31.01.2013 passed in Civil Application No.10530 of 2012 is hereby modified and the amount of Rs.50,776, which is stated to have been deposited by respondent no.1 - insurance company should be read as Rs.13,58,582/-. The present application is accordingly disposed of. Rule is made absolute.

Direct Service is permitted.

(A.G.URAIZEE, J.) mohd Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Mon Aug 14 12:53:42 IST 2017