Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rajiv Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. on 11 May, 2016

Bench: Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, S.A. Bobde

                                                              1

     ITEM NO.14                                      COURT NO.6                    SECTION XI

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                            No.13358/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2016
     in SAD No. 34/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
     Allahabad)

     RAJIV KUMAR SINGH AND ORS                                                      Petitioner(s)

                                                             VERSUS

     STATE OF U.P. AND ORS                                                          Respondent(s)

     (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to
     place addl. documents on record)

     Date : 11/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE

     For Petitioner(s)                         Mr.   S. R. Singh, Sr. Adv.
                                               Mr.   Avnish Singh, Adv.
                                               Mr.   Ankur Yadav, Adv.
                                               Ms.   Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Considering the peculiar facts of the case, we are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition, which is dismissed.

However, it is open to the petitioners to approach respondent No.5 - Basic Shiksha Adhikari and seek for a relief that Buniyadi Shiksha Visarad Certificate be treated at par with Basic Training Certificate (BTC), which they have stated to have secured prior to Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by RASHMI DHYANI 09.01.1995 by relying upon a decision of this Court rendered in Date: 2016.05.12 12:51:29 IST Reason: Suresh Pal & Ors. versus State of Haryana & Ors., reported in AIR 1987 SC 2027. In the event of the petitioners approaching the respondent No.5 - Basic Shiksha Adhikari with any such 2 representation, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

  (RASHMI DHYANI)                                     (SHARDA KAPOOR)
    SR.P.A.                                            COURT MASTER