Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Koribilli V R Naga Lakshmi @ Koribilli V ... vs Unknown on 12 December, 2025

                                                                                   [3299 ]
            (SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION)
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
               FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
                   TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
                                                                               -
                                                                                    V %      f
                                                                         w •                         i


                                      ■PRESENT:                                V'            '.F         ,4>

                                                                                                 ✓
                                                                                                     /

           THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI                               s




CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3561 OF 2025 Between:

1. Koribilli V R Naga Lakshmi @ Koribilli V Roja Naga Lakshmi, W/o. Karri Sankara Rao, D/o. Koribilli Kondala Rao, aged about 46 years, resident of D. No. 20-2-42, China Ramaswamy Temple Street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli, Anakapalli District.
2. Karri Sankara Rao, S/o. N'dokaraju, aged about 48 years, working as Junior Assistant, residing at Vidyutnagar, near water works.

Thummapala, Anakapalli, Arakapalli District.

.... Petitiobers/Petitioners/Respondent Nos.1 and 2/ Defendant No.1 and 2 AND

1. Surisetty Naga Venkata Appa Rao @ Raju, S/o. late Jagga Appa Rao, aged about 51 years, R/o: D. No. 10- 8/3, Ward No. 4, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.

2. Surisetty Gayatri, W/o. Surisetty Naga Venkata Appa Rao, aged about 45 years, R/o. D. No. 10-8/3, Ward No. 4, Madhurawada Visakhapatnam.

...Respondents/Respdndent Nos.1 and 2/Petitioners/Plaintiffs.

3. Koribilli Kondala Rao, S/o. Late Rama Rao, aged about 62 years, R/o. D. NO. 13-2, Gundaia Veedhi, Thummapala, Anakapalli, Anakapalli District (Formal Party, Not Necessary).

.... Respohdent/Respondent No.3/Respondent no/3/ Defendant No.3 > WHEREAS the Petitione^r above named through their Advocate SRI MULLA SOHAIL SHAREEF presented this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision petition, by allowing the I.A. No. 183 of 2025 in I.A. No. 207 of 2024 in O.S. No. 190 of 2024 on the file of the Learned III Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Anakapalle.

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and emorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MULLA SOHAIL SHAREEF Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondents hefdih to show cause as to why this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be admitted.

You viz:

1. Surisetty Naga Venkata Appa Rao @ Raju, S/o. late Jagga Appa Rao, aged about 51 years, R/o. D. No. 10- 8/3, Ward No. 4, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.
2. Surisetty Gayatri, W/o. Surisetty Naga Venkata Appa Rao, aged about 45 years, R/o. D. Ndf i 0-8/3, Ward No. 4, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. -

are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an advocate within four weeks to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be admitted.

The Court made the following: ORDER In the suit, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.207 of 2024 in O.S.No.190 of 2024 for grant of in the said temporary injunction and application, the petitioner filed I.A.No.183 of 2025 for appointing the advocate commissioner, disputing the survey number and the boundaries of the plaint schedule properties. The said application has been rejected by the order under challenge on the ground that the objection was not raised with respect to the identificatidh of the property.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the dispute having been raised in respect of the survey number, the identification of the property was in dispute.

3. Issue notice to the respondents.

4. List after four weeks.

Sd/-M.PRABHAKAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEOTON OFFICER To,

1. Surisetty Naga Venkata Appa Rao @ Raju, S/o. late Jagga Appa Rao, aged about 51 years, R/o.T). No. 10- 8/3, Ward No. 4, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.

2. Surisetty Gayatri, W/o. Surisetty Naga Venkata Appa Rao, aged about 45 years, R/o. D. No. 10-8/3, Ward No. 4, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.(1 & 2 by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)

3. One CC to SRI. MULLA SOHAIL SHAREEF Advocate [OPUC]

4. One spare copy V HIGH COURT RNT, J DATED: 12/12/2025 List after four weeks.

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CRP.No.3561 of 2025 ifs 111 3 fl DEC 'I