Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3] [Entire Act]

State of Gujarat - Section

Section 10 in The Gujarat Infrastructure Development Act, 1999

10. [Inviting comparative bids] [Marginal note substituted by Gujarat 18 of 2006, dated 31st March, 2006 (w.e.f. 15-05 2006).].

- [(1) Where a proposal for undertaking a project and a proposed concession agreement prepared by a person are submitted to the State Government, the Government agency or a specified Government agency, it may,(a)consider the proposal and the proposed concession agreement from all aspects (including technical and financial) and if necessary, modify the same in consultation with the person who has submitted the proposal and the proposed concession agreement; and(b)submit the proposal and the proposed concession agreement to the Board, if-(i)the cost of the project exceeds the limit provided by regulations under sub-section (1) of section 5, and(ii)the undertaking of the project does not require financial assistance in the form of subsidy from the State Government, the Government agency or the specified Government Agency.]
(2)On acceptance of the recommendation of the Board made under sub-section (2) of section 5, the State Government, the Government agency or, as the case may be, the specified Government agency shall adopt the proposal as the basis for selecting a person with whom concession agreement for undertaking the project may be entered into, and for selecting such person, the State Government, the Government agency or, as the case may be, the specified Government agency shall follow the procedure of competitive public bidding [prescribed under] [Substituted for 'specified in' by Gujarat 18 of 2006, dated 31st March, 2006 (w.e.f. 15-05-2006).] section 9.
(3)Where a person is selected by following the procedure of the competitive public bidding (hereinafter referred to as "the selected person"), the proposal of the selected person shall be compared with the proposal which is earlier submitted by a person to the State Government, the Government agency or, as the case may be, the specified Government agency under sub-section (1) (hereinafter referred to as "the earlier proposer").
(4)Where the proposal of the earlier proposer is not preferable to the proposal of the selected person, the earlier proposer shall be given an opportunity to make his proposal competitive with that of the selected person within a period of thirty days from the date on which he has been given the opportunity and where the earlier proposer fails to do so within the said period, the State Government, the Government agency or, as the case may be, the specified Government agency may enter into a contract with the selected person.
(5)
(a)Where a concession agreement has not been entered into with the earlier proposer, the cost of preparation of the proposal and the concession agreement incurred by him shall be reimbursed by the State Government, the Government agency or, as the case may be, the specified Government agency and on such reimbursement, the proposal and the concession agreement submitted by the earlier proposer shall be the property of the State Government, the Government agency or, as the case may be, the specified Government agency.
(b)The cost of preparation of the proposal and the concession agreement shall be determined in such a manner as may be prescribed.