Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Smt. Samruddhi Samar Sapre vs Five Star Co-Op Housing Society Ltd on 1 February, 2012

  
 
 
 
 
 
 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
  
 
 
 
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

STATE CONSUMER
    DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA
    
   
    
     
     

CIRCUIT BENCH
    AT   NAGPUR
    
   
    
     
     

5 TH FLOOR,
    ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
    
   
    
     
     

CIVIL LINES,
    NAGPUR-440 001
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

Complaint
      Case No. CC/01/256
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

1.

Smt. Samruddhi Samar Sapre

2. Samar P Sapre Both R/o Prashant Nagar Flat No. 1 Ground Floor Chintamani Apartments Ajni Chowk Wardha Road Nagpur ...........Complainant(s)     Versus    

1. Five Star Co-Op Housing Society Ltd.

17, Farmland, Ramdaspeth Nagpur through its President Shri Arvind N Tarekar R/o 17, Farm Land, Ramdaspeth Nagpur.

 

2. Smt Anuradha Arvind N Tarekar R/o 17, Farm Land, Ramdaspeth Nagpur.

............Opp.Party(s)   BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole Presiding Member   Hon'ble Smt.Jayshree Yengal Member   Hon'ble Mr.N. Arumugam Member   PRESENT:
Adv.Mr S B Solat ......for the Complainant   Adv.Mr Aniket Pande ......for the Opp. Party   ORDER (Delivered on 01.02.2012)   Per Mr S M Shembole, Honble Presiding Member   Adv.Mr S B Solat for the complainant and Adv. Mr Aniket Pande for the opponent are present. On last date, Adv. Mr Solat was directed to file his Vakilpatra but he has not filed the same. On the contrary, he submitted that in spite of giving notice to the complainant, complainant did not turn up. He has also produced copy of notice dtd.05.12.2011. He has also produced the postal envelop, which was sent to the complainant. On perusal of this envelop, it reflects that the same envelop is returned as complainant has left his address. Therefore, there is no other alternative except to dismiss the complaint. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed.
 
No order as to cost.
Copy of this order be supplied to the parties.
 
 [S M SHEMBOLE] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER sj