Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Thomas Vadakkekunnel vs T.Pradeep Kumar on 11 January, 2016

Author: B. Kemal Pasha

Bench: B.Kemal Pasha

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT:

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

           MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/21ST POUSHA, 1937

                        WP(C).No. 25579 of 2010 (Q)
                        ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):


       THOMAS VADAKKEKUNNEL,
       VADAKKEKUNNEL HOUSE, KALLIYAR P.O.,
       THODUPUZHA.

       BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
               SRI.K.M.KURIAN

RESPONDENT(S):


       1. T.PRADEEP KUMAR,
           D.F.O SANDAL DIVISION, MARAYUR,
           NOW WORKING AS D.F.O.,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

       2. THE DY.S.P. CRIME BRANCH CID,
           THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI - 685 584.

        3. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
           (CRIMES) CRIME BRANCH C.I.D. HEAD QUARTERS,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

       4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
           FOREST & WILD LIFE DEPARTMENT-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

       R1  BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR
       R2 TO R4 BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.MADHAVANKUTTY FOR FOREST.

       THIS  WRIT  PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING  BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON
       11-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




rvs.

WP(C).No. 25579 of 2010 (Q)



                                      APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :


EXT. P1        TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXT. P2        TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT.

EXT. P3        TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF CHARGE
               SHEET.

EXT. P4        TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF CHARGE
               SHEET.

EXT. P5        DEPOSITION OF CW-6.

EXT. P5(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-6.

EXT. P6        DEPOSITION OF CW-7.

EXT. P6(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-7.

EXT. P7        DEPOSITION OF CW-9.

EXT. P7(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-9.

EXT. P8        DEPOSITION OF CW-2.

EXT. P8(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-2.

EXT. P9        DEPOSITION OF CW-3.

EXT. P9(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-3.

EXT. P10       DEPOSITION OF CW-4.

EXT. P10(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-4.

EXT. P11       DEPOSITION OF CW-5.

EXT. P11(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-5.

WP(C).No. 25579 of 2010 (Q)



EXT. P12       DEPOSITION OF CW-11.

EXT. P12(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-11.

EXT. P13       DEPOSITION OF CW-31.

EXT. P13(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-31.

EXT. P14       DEPOSITION OF CW-13.

EXT. P14(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-13.

EXT. P15       DEPOSITION OF CW-18.

EXT. P15(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-18.

EXT. P16       DEPOSITION OF CW-1.

EXT. P16(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION OF DEPOSITION
               OF CW-1.


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :


               NIL.

                                                   /TRUE COPY/



                                                   P.A.TO JUDGE


rvs.



                   B. KEMAL PASHA, J.
              =====================
                W.P.(C).No.25579 of 2010
              =====================
           Dated this the 11th day of January, 2016

                      J U D G M E N T

The 1st respondent was the concerned DFO, who was indicted in a case of murder alleging offence punishable under Section 302 IPC etc. The Government has declined sanction for the prosecution of the 1st respondent, who was the then DFO. That is under challenge in this Writ Petition (Civil).

2. The learned Senior Counsel for the 1st respondent has pointed out that presently the 1st respondent is no more and therefore, the charge as against the 1st respondent has abated. It is true that when the 1st respondent is no more, W.P.(C).No.25579 of 2010 -: 2 :- the charge against him shall stand abated. Therefore, any further consideration of the present Writ Petition (Civil) is not required.

Matters being so, this Writ Petition is disposed of by recording the submission of the learned Senior Counsel that the 1st respondent is no more.

Sd/-

B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE.

DSV/11/1/16 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge