Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Seventh Day Adventist Matriculation vs The Commissioner on 23 July, 2019

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                            1

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 23.07.2019

                                                        CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                               CRL.O.P No.19491 of 2019
                                                         and
                                               Crl.M.P No.9984 of 2019

                      Seventh Day Adventist Matriculation
                      School, rep. by its Principal
                      Mr.Edwin Samuel
                      No.79/249, GST Road,
                      Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.                                ...Petitioner


                                                                      Vs.

                      The Commissioner,
                      Tambaram Municipality
                      Chennai-600 045.                                        ...Respondent




                      PRAYER :     Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal
                      Procedure Code, to call for the records culminated in S.T.C No.65 of 2018
                      pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tambaram and quash
                      the same.
                                           For Petitioner       : Mr.R.Prabhakaran




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                            2


                                                      ORDER

This petition has been filed challenging the criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent for an offence under Section 216(1)(2)(3) r/w 313, 317(a)(c) of the District Municipalities Act 1920.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the offence itself has not been made out in this case. The respondent has proceeded to file a complaint on the ground that the petitioner has put up illegal construction without sanction. However, it is the case of the petitioner that the sanction was sought for and it was not processed within time and it was kept pending and therefore, there was a deemed sanction in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, the prosecution initiated by the respondent itself is an abuse of process of Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in order to substantiate his arguments relied upon various documents.

4. This Court exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C cannot conduct a roving enquiry on this issue. This issue as to whether there http://www.judis.nic.in 3 was a deemed sanction in favour of the petitioner, under the provisions of the Act, requires a factual finding based on documents. That can be done only by the Court below and not by this Court exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

5. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all these grounds before the Court below and the Court below shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law.

6. This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in S.T.C No. 65 of 2018 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

23.07.2019 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No uma To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram.

2. The Commissioner, Tambaram Municipality Chennai-600 045.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4 N.ANAND VENKATESH.J., uma CRL.OP.No.19491 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.9984 of 2019 23.07.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in