Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mohmmad Aslam vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 November, 2021

Author: V.G.Bisht

Bench: V.G.Bisht

                                                                     24-ABA-2436-2021.DOC

         Digitally
         signed by
         TRUPTI
TRUPTI   SADANAND
SADANAND BAMNE
BAMNE    Date:
         2021.11.23
         16:20:33              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         +0530




                           ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2436 OF 2021

                      Mohmmad Aslam                                      ...Applicant

                               Versus

                      State of Maharashtra                               ...Respondent

                                                ......
                      Mr.Veerdhawal Deshmukh for the Applicant.
                      Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent -State.
                      Mr.M.V. Biranje, NC-1198, Kagal Police Station, District -
                      Kolhapur.
                                                ......
                                             CORAM:         V.G.BISHT, J.
                                             DATE:          22ND NOVEMBER, 2021
                      PC:-

                      1.       By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in

                      connection with C.R.No. 308 of 2019 registered with Kagal

                      Police Station, Kolhapur for the offences punishable under

                      Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (the IPC) and under

                      Sections 3 (2) (d) and 9 of the Essential Commodities Act and

                      under Sections 7, 11 (5), 12, 19 (c) (ii) and 21 (A) of the

                      Fertilizers Control Order, 1985 (for short, " the FCO, 1985")




                      Trupti                                                                 1/5
                                               24-ABA-2436-2021.DOC




2.       It is the case of the prosecution that the informant was

inspecting the fertilizer sale centre of one M/s. Yashodhan

Agro Services, Kagal and found that "Super Potash" (a

suspected fertilizer) manufactured by M/s. Jaipur Bio

Fertilizers of Rajasthan was stored without any legal

permission.



3.       It is further alleged that the Fertilizer License No. LAFD

14080282 of M/s. Yashodhan Agro Services, Kagal was valid

as on 16th May, 2019 but they had not renewed in time. It is

further alleged that the informant under the provisions of FCO

1985 took from the suspected Super Potash fertilizer bag, a

fertilizer sample bearing No. 14012310720192020F and sent

it to the Fertilizer Control Laboratory for analysis. It is alleged

that when the analysis report No. 717 dated 16th August, 2019

was received from Fertilizer Control Laboratory, Kolhapur, it

was mentioned that 5 number grade of "straight potassium

fertilizers" under 1 (C) of Schedule I Part A of FCO 1985 of

the fertilizer sample No. 14012310720192020F            is "Potash




Trupti                                                                2/5
                                            24-ABA-2436-2021.DOC




Derived from Molasses".     Accordingly, offence came to be

registered.



4.       Mr. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the applicant,

submits that only the first analysis report was taken into

consideration. The sample, however, was not sent for second

and third analysis. As per the provisions of 32-A of FCO 1985,

according to learned Counsel, the reference analysis (second

report) supersedes the first report. The third analysis report

supersedes both- the first and second reports and shall be

treated as final.   Learned Counsel, lastly, submits that the

third reference has been issued on 27th January, 2021 by the

National Test Report (East Region), Government of India

stating that the product "Super Potash" failed to meet the

requirements for being classified as "Potash Derived from

Molasses". Moreover, M/s. Yashodhan Agro Services, Kagal

has renewed the license in question. For all these reasons, the

ad-interim protection granted in favour of the applicant

deserves to be confirmed, argued learned Counsel.




Trupti                                                            3/5
                                              24-ABA-2436-2021.DOC




5.       Mrs.Malhotra, learned APP, on the other hand, fairly

submits that the licenses has been renewed by M/s.

Yashodhan Agro Services, Kagal and in view of third reference

report, an appropriate order may be passed.



6.       I have gone through the third reference report, which is

placed on record at "Annexure -D" of the application. From

the said report, it is very much clear that the product "Super

Potash" had failed to meet the requirements for being

classified as "Potash Derived from Molasses". Thus, what was

seized was not chemical fertilizer without any authority.



7.       Moreover, M/s. Yashodhan Agro Services, Kagal has

admittedly renewed the licenses. In view of above, the ad-

interim protection given by this Court on 8th October, 2021

needs to be confirmed. Hence, the following order :

                              ORDER

i) The application is allowed.

Trupti 4/5

24-ABA-2436-2021.DOC

ii) The ad-interim protection granted by this Court on 8th October, 2021 is confirmed and made absolute.

iii) The application stands disposed of accordingly.

(V.G.BISHT, J. ) Trupti 5/5