Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Rukmani Sharma & Others on 7 January, 2016

Bench: Rajiv Sharma, Dharam Chand Chaudhary

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                                      Rev. Petition No. 8 of 2016

                                       Date of Decision: 7.1.2016




                                                             .

    Central Bureau of Investigation

                                                   ...Petitioner
                         Versus





    Rukmani Sharma & others

                                                ...Respondents




                                      of
    ___________________________________________________________
    Coram
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.
                  rt
    Whether approved for reporting?
    _________________________________________________________
    For the petitioner       :      Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Senior

                                    Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Negi,
                                    Adv.

    For the respondents :    Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate
                             General with Mr. P.M. Negi and


                             Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant
                             Advocate       General,     for
                             respondents-State.




    Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
CMP(M) No. 41 of 2016

Heard.

In view of the grounds taken in the application, duly supported by an affidavit and in the interest of justice, delay in filing the present review petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:41:40 :::HCHP 2 Rev. Petition No. 8 of 2016

There is no error apparent on the face of record and the same does not fall within the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 .

CPC. Consequently, the present review petition is dismissed.

No costs.

(Rajiv Sharma), Judge of (Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge January 7, 2016rt (kalpana) 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:41:40 :::HCHP