Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Sau Manisha Rameshwar Londhe & Ors vs Shri Kailash Digambar Masal & Ors on 12 January, 2011

  
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON



 

 
    
     
     


       
          
           
           


          BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
        
         
           
           


          COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
        
      
    
     

 
  
   
     
     

 
  
   
     
     
        
         
         
            
             
             


            First Appeal No. A/09/1065
          
           
             
             


            (Arisen out of Order Dated 18/06/2009 in Case No. 18/2009 of 
            District Solapur)
          
        
         

 
      
       
         
         

 
      
       
         
         
            
             
             
                
                 
                 

1.

SAU MANISHA RAMESHWAR LONDHE & ORS R/O CHOUDHARI PLOT, KURDUWADI, TAL- MHADA SOLAPUR Maharastra   ...........Appellant(s) Versus

1. SHRI KAILASH DIGAMBAR MASAL & ORS R/O PWD BLOCK -B ROOM NO 5 T V CENTER, KUMTHA NAKA SOLAPUR Maharastra   ...........Respondent(s)       BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase PRESIDENT   Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode Judicial Member   Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member     PRESENT:
   
None for the appellants Respondent no.1 in person         ORDER Per Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase, Honble President                           This matter was heard by the State Commission on 06/4/2010 and it was rejected.  Said order of the State Commission was challenged by way of revision petition no.2487/2010 before the National Commission.  Honble National Commission has remitted back the matter to the State Commission and directed parties to remain present before the State Commission on 13/12/2010. In accordance with such direction respondent remained present before the State Commission on 13/12/2010.  However, the appellant was not present.  Appellant and their advocate were absent.  Therefore, appeal was adjourned to 12/1/2011.  Today also respondent is present, however, appellant and appellants advocate both are absent. No one reports their difficulty.  Under these circumstances appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.  It is clarified that there is no stay granted by the State Commission while pendency of appeal.
It is further clarified that the stay granted by the National Commission was granted during pendency of revision petition.  However, thereafter it was not extended and as on today there is no stay to the order and the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum can proceed with the execution, if filed.
Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.
 Pronounced Dated 12th January 2011       [Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase] PRESIDENT     [Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode] Judicial Member     [Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar] Member     Ms.