Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Pankaj Singh vs The State Of Haryana on 5 July, 2023

Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat, Aravind Kumar

     ITEM NO.1                          COURT NO.9                 SECTION II-B

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)               No(s).    3165/2023

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-01-2023
     in CRAS No. 3136/2019 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana
     At Chandigarh)

     PANKAJ SINGH                                                    Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

     THE STATE OF HARYANA                                            Respondent(s)


     IA No. 50301/2023 - EX-PARTE BAIL
     IA No. 53965/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
     IA No. 52546/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
     IA No. 50302/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
     IA No. 70963/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
     IA No. 52544/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
     IA No. 53964/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
     IA No. 52541/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
     IA No. 70962/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     Date : 05-07-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr. Deepak Prakash, AOR
                                   Mr. Raneev Dahiya, Adv.
                                   Mr. Pawan Kr. Dabas, Adv.
                                   Mr. Nachikta Vajpayee, Adv.
                                   Ms. Divyangna Malik, Adv.
                                   Mr. Rahul Lakhera, Adv.
                                   Mr. Shyam Nair, Adv.
                                   Ms. Vishnu Priya, Adv.
                                   Mr. Vardaan Kapoor, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)             Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                   Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv.
Digitally signed by
Nisha Khulbey
Date: 2023.07.05
                                   Ms. Shehla Choudhary, Adv.
16:53:26 IST
Reason:                            Md. Anas Choudhary, Adv.
                                   Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR


                                                 1
                   Mr. Rakesh K. Mudgal, A.A.G.
                   Mr. Dinesh Mudgal, Adv.
                   Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR



          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

Admitted.

Original records be called for from the lower courts. Having considered the circumstances as well as the fact that the petitioner has served nearly three years sentence, this Court is of the opinion that he deserves to be enlarged on bail. The applicant is, therefore, directed to be enlarged on bail subject to such terms and conditions as the trial court may impose during the pendancy of this appeal, including the condition with respect to his periodic reporting to the police station. Hearing expedited.

List the appeal for hearing on 13.09.2023.

(HARSHITA UPPAL)                                  (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                        COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                 2