Kerala High Court
V. Shyamohan vs State Of Kerala on 13 November, 2025
2025:KER:86782
WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. V. JAYAKUMAR
TH
THURSDAY, THE 13
DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 / 22ND KARTHIKA,
1947
WP(C) NO. 41785 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
. SHYAMOHAN
V
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O VELAYUDHAN NAIR, HAVING ADDRESS AT C-84, GOLF VIEW
APARTMENTS, SAKET, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110017
Y ADVS.
B
SRI.MATHEW A KUZHALANADAN
SHRI.KURIAKOSE VARGHESE
SMT.SRADHAXNA MUDRIKA
SHRI.NABEEL B.A.
SHRI.CHERIYIL SANIL JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1 TATE OF KERALA S REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (DEVASWOM) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 HE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, T OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689645 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :2: 3 RAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD T REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEVASWOM HEAD QUARTERS, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 4 RINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS P
4. OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014 5 HE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER T (APPOINTED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA) SABARIMALA TEMPLE COMPLEX, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 689645 6 HE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, T SABARIMALA, PAMPA TRIVENI P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689670 OTHER PRESENT: RI.S.RAJMOHAN, SR. GP S SRI. G. BIJU, SC TDB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL EARING H ON13.11.2025, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVEREDTHE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :3: "CR" J U D G M E N T Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J. The petitioner, a lawyer and devoted follower of Lord Ayyappa, complains that although he has secured a Virtual Queue (e-pass) for darshan at Sabarimala on 17.11.2025, there has been no proper public notificationregardingtheopeningoftheTraditionalRoute(KananaPatha) from Erumeli to Sannidhanam. He states that authorities have indicated that the route will be opened only on 17.11.2025, which would make it impossibleforhimandotherpilgrimsholdinge-passesforthesamedayto undertake the customary forest trek. He contends thatunlessthepathis opened by at least 15.11.2025, devotees like him will be forced to abandon the pilgrimage. The petitioner also highlights the lack of timely and transparent communication from the Travancore Devaswom Board and the Forest Department, noting that theofficialportaldoesnot clearly notify the date of opening of the Kanana Patha, causing hardship and frustrating the legitimate expectations of pilgrims who prepare rigorously for the traditional journey. Itisintheabovebackdropthatthis 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :4: writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: (i) To issue a writ, order, or direction directingtherespondents not to cause any hindrance to the petitioner and other pilgrims undertaking the Sabarimala pilgrimage through the Traditional Route (Erumeli-Sabarimala Route) from 15.11.2025, so as to reach Sannidhanam when the temple opens for the Mandala season of 2025; (ii) Toissueawrit,order,ordirectionrestrainingtherespondents from placing unreasonable restrictions that may hinder the peacefulpilgrimageofdevoteesthroughtheTraditionalRoute (Erumeli-Sannidhanam) in a manner underminingtheirright to freely practice their faith and beliefs; (iii) To issue directions to the respondents to publish, at least thirty days prior to commencement of the Mandala-Makaravilakku season, official notifications and circulars detailing the scheduleofopeningoftheSabarimala Temple and the Erumeli-Sabarimala Route; (iv)ToensurestrictcompliancewiththedirectionsofthisHon'ble Court in SSCR No. 79 of 2024. 2. The petitioner has also sought interim relief interdicting the respondents from imposing unreasonable restrictions that may hinder or disrupt the peaceful pilgrimage of devotees throughtheTraditionalRoute from Erumeli to Sannidhanam, thereby safeguarding their right to freely practice and manifest their religious beliefs. 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :5: 3. When the matter came up for consideration on 07.11.2025, this Court directed the respondents to obtain instructions. 4. On 12.11.2025, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the Travancore Devaswom Board, after consulting the District Collectors of the three Districts through which the route passes and obtaining inputs from the Forest Department, decided that the Kanana Patha shall beopenedon17.11.2025,coincidingwiththecommencement of the Mandala-Makaravilakku season, inconformitywithlong-established practice. 5. A detailed statement was filed by the 4th respondent as directed by this Court. It is stated that the Sabarimala Dharma Shastha Temple is situated deep within the evergreen forests of the Periyar Tiger Reserve, an area of National importance, conferred with the status of Reserve ForestandWildlifeSanctuaryduetoitsrichbiodiversityandhigh conservation value. All routestothetemplepassthroughthisecologically sensitive Reserve, spanning the districts of Kottayam, Idukki, and Pathanamthitta. Permissiontousethe"KananaPatha"isgrantedannually from the first day of Vrischikam to Makaravilakku, strictly in accordance 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :6: with the approved Tiger Conservation Plan (2022-2032) and following a coordinated consultation among the concerned District Collectors and Divisional Forest Officers. The 4th respondent further states that the pilgrimage management activities are undertaken through Participatory ForestManagementpractices,witheightThavalamsoperatedbytheSAPP (Swamy Ayyappan Poomkavana Punarudharana), an Eco-Development Committees (EDC) along the Koikkalkkavu-Pampa traditional trek route. TheseEDCsprovideeco-friendlycamping,food,andsanitationfacilitiesas per their approved microplans. Establishing these facilities requires extensive preparation and logistics support, including transporting men and materials to remote Thavalams within dense forest terrain. Accordingly, these Thavalams can become operational only from 17.11.2025. It is stated that in light of the judgment of this Court dated 22.12.2022 in W.P.(C) No. 40899 of 2022, and consistent with the approved Tiger Conservation Plan, the entry of pilgrims through the Traditional Route is strictly regulated for reasons of safety and wildlife protection. The operational timings and guidelines are disseminated through the "Ayyan" Mobile App launched by the Periyar Tiger Reserve management. The claim of the petitioner that such information is not 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :7: made public was expressly denied. 6. Dr. Mathew Kuzhalnadan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the failure to notify the opening of the Traditional Route in advance amounts to a violation of the rights of pilgrims such as the petitioner. He submitted that no unreasonable restrictionscanbeimposedondevoteesseekingtoperformthepilgrimage peacefullythroughthecustomarypath.Accordingtohim,therestrictions placed by the respondents would infringe the rights ofthepetitionerand other pilgrims under Article 14 and 25 of the Constitution of India. 7. The learned Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel for the TDB submitted that the Sabarimala Temple is located in the heart of the Periyar Tiger Reserve, surrounded by dense forests inhabited by tigers, elephants, bison, wild boar, bears, andleopards.The Erumeli-Pamparoute,spanningapproximately35-45kilometresofrugged terrain and requiring nearly eight hours of continuous trekking, traverses highly sensitive wildlife corridors. For these reasons, the route is strictly regulatedbytheForestDepartmenttopreventecologicaldegradationand human-wildlife conflict. Entry is permitted only during daylight hours, 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :8: typically between 7:00 a.m. and 2:00-3:00 p.m., and pilgrims must pass through multiple forest check-posts and designatedrestingshelters(Viri). Thelearnedcounselalsoreferredtothetragicstampedeof2011,inwhich hundreds of devotees lost their lives due to overcrowding, underscoring the necessity of multi-departmental coordination involving the police, healthservices,forestguards,fireandrescueteams,andtheNDRF.Itwas emphasized that such measures areindispensabletoensurethesafetyof pilgrims andtheprotectionoftheforestecosystem.Finallyitissubmitted that the operational timings and guidelines are disseminated through the "Ayyan" Mobile App launched by the Periyar Tiger Reserve management and the assertions to the contrary are incorrect. 8. We have carefully considered the submissions of both sides. The principal prayer ofthepetitioneristosynchronizetheopeningofthe KananaPathawiththeopeningofthetempleon17.11.2025.AstheNada is scheduled to open on 17.11.2025, with the consent of both sides, we have taken up this matter for final hearing. 9. At the outset, we notice that the issue raised in this petition stands squarely covered inC.N. Madhusoodanan v. State ofKerala1, 1 2022 KHC OnLine 8093 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :9: wherein this Court,uponconsideringreportsfromtheDistrictPoliceChief andtheDeputyDirectorofthePeriyarTigerReserve,heldthatrestrictions on the timing and regulation of trekking through the forest route are essential for ensuring the safety of pilgrims and conservation of the Reserve. The Court further observed that the Reserve, being a protected area, such restrictions warrant no interference. 10. It is undisputed that the Traditional Route traverses an ecologically fragile region of significant biodiversity.Althoughonlyasmall fractionoftheapproximately50lakhpilgrimsvisitingSabarimalaeachyear undertake this long forest trek, even that limited number poses considerable logistical and ecological challenges.Itisamatterofconcern that no restrictions whatsoever are presently imposed on the number of persons permitted to traverse the Kanana Patha to reach Pamba. When groups comprising hundreds of pilgrims move through this sensitive terrain, serious damage is caused to the Periyar Tiger Reserve. Notwithstanding intensive monitoring, pilgrimsmaystrayfromdesignated paths, engage in cooking, construct temporary resting places usingtwigs and other forest produce, disturb wildlife, and carry non-biodegradable materialssuchasplastic.Therehavebeenreportedinstancesofelephants 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :10: dying after ingesting plastic waste, underscoring thegraveenvironmental consequences of unregulated access. Numerous incidents of human-animal conflict have also been recorded, with unsuspecting pilgrims losing their lives upon inadvertently entering the habitat of wild animals. The accumulation of waste,deforestation,forestfires,andother formsofenvironmentaldegradationremainpersistentthreats,exacerbated by the continued reliance of pilgrims on forest resources for fuel and temporary shelter. 11. We have no doubt in our mind that the protection of the environmentisaparamountconsideration.Wefinditdifficulttoacceptthe contention advanced by the petitioner that the respondents should sync the entry permit given to the petitioner with the opening of the Kanana Patha. The Reserve Forest is not a transit route. It is a living ecosystem thattheStateisconstitutionallyboundtoconserve.Pasttragediesin1999 and 2011,leadingtothelossofhundredsoflives,revealthecatastrophic risks of unmanaged pilgrimages. In addition, unpredictable weather, the difficultterrain,andthenecessityforcoordinationamongtheCollectorsof Pathanamthitta, Idukki, and Kottayam, each heading their respective District Disaster Management Authorities,makeitimperativefortheTDB, 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :11: DistrictAdministrationandForestDepartmenttoexerciseextremecaution and regulate access. 12. The introduction of the Virtual Queue system after the 2011 tragedy was a crowd management measure, aimed at preventing congestion and ensuring safety at Sannidhanam. Though it primarily governstheentrythroughPamba,itnecessarilywouldindirectlyaffectthe movementofdevoteesalongtheforestrouteaswell.However,thelarger risks of stampedes,medicalemergencies,orhuman-wildlifeencountersin such terrain justifies the restrictions imposed. 13. Weareoftheconsideredviewthatthesafetyofpilgrimsand the preservation of the Periyar Tiger Reserve demandstrictadherenceto the carrying capacity of (i) the Sannidhanam precincts, (ii) the approach andqueuemanagementcorridors,and(iii)thefeedernodesatPambaand along the TraditionalRoute.Theterm"carryingcapacity"wouldmeanthe maximum number of pilgrims who can be accommodated at any given timeorperhourwithoutcausingunacceptableriskstolife,publicorder,or the environment. The respondents are accordingly advised to determine and notify the maximum number of pilgrims who may be permitted to 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :12: traverse the Traditional Path on any given day. 14. The determination of carrying capacity isatechnicalexercise which, if not already undertaken, must be carried out by the Travancore Devaswom Board in coordination with the DistrictPolice,HealthServices, Disaster Management Authorities, and the Forest Department. This determinationshallbebasedonscientificparameterssuchastopography, crowd density thresholds, emergency evacuation capabilities, and ecological sensitivity. 15. In light of past tragedies and in keeping with the Precautionary Principle, the respondents would be well advised to: (a) Publish, before the commencementofeachMandala-Makaravilakku season, the computed carrying capacity (including peak simultaneouspresenceandhourlythroughput)forSannidhanamand each feeder node, along with contingency down-rating for adverse weather or emergency conditions; (b) Issue dynamic advisories, including temporary suspensions or restricted time windows,whencrowddensitiesapproachcautionary 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :13: thresholds; (c) employ appropriate technological systems to monitor, in real time, thenumberofpersonspresentatSannidhanamandtorecordthose remaining beyond the permissible time limits; (d) maintain a real-time integrated control room, if not already operational, linking the Travancore DevaswomBoard,Police,Health Services, Forest Department, and NDRF, to continuously monitor footfall,queuelengths,andmedicalincidents,andtotriggerphased holds whenever necessary; and (e) reflect the above data and advisories on public-facing platforms, includingtheVirtualQueueportalandtheAyyanmobileapplication, thereby enabling pilgrims to plan their routes and timings responsibly. 16. We are not persuaded by the petitioner'scontentionthatthe defermentoftheopeningofthe'KananaPatha'infringesuponhisreligious freedom.Article25oftheConstitutionguaranteesfreedomofreligion,but it is subject topublicorder,morality,andhealth.ThedutyoftheStateto 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :14: safeguard lives and preserve the environment constitutes a reasonable restrictionunderthisprovision.Theavoweddesireofthepilgrimistohave darshan of Lord Ayyappa and perform the holy rituals. The mode of reachingthetemplecanbeseenasameanstoanend,nottheenditself. The vast majority of Ayyappa devotees today reach Sabarimala by other routeswithoutanydoctrinalimpropriety,whichwouldmeanthatwhilethe traditional route is hallowed by custom, it is not mandated as per any religious tenets or scriptures. There is no scriptural injunction that one mustonlyarriveviaErumeliforesttofulfillthepilgrimage.Rather,itwasa logistical necessity when there were no roads or access and a respected tradition.Undernocircumstances,canthemodeofaccesstoatemplebe construedasanessentialreligiouspractice. InNarHariSastriandOrs. vs. Shri Badrinath TempleCommittee2,itwasheldbyaThreeJudge Bench of the Apex Court that the right of entry into a public temple is, however, not an unregulated or unrestricted right. It is open to the trustees of a public temple to regulate the time of public visits and fix certainhoursoftheday,duringwhichalone,membersofthepublicwould be allowed access to the shrine. The temple authorities would alwaysbe competenttomakeandenforcerulestoensuregoodorderanddecencyof 2 (1952) 1 SCC 689 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :15: worship and prevent overcrowding in a temple. Good conduct or orderly behavior is always an obligatory condition of admission into a temple. 17. As observed above, the opening of the Kanana Patha necessitatescoordinatedactionacrossmultipledepartments,includingthe Police,HealthServices,ForestGuards,FireandRescuepersonnel,andthe NDRF. It was only after comprehensive inter-departmental consultation andduediligencethatthedateforopeningtheKananaPathawasfinalised as 17.11.2025, to coincide with the opening of the temple. This decision has also been duly reflected in the Ayyan mobile application for the information of all pilgrims. In these circumstances, it is incumbent upon the petitioner to plan and coordinate his travel in accordance with the established schedule. He cannot insist that the Patha be opened to align solely with his personal convenience, disregarding the larger administrative, logistical, and safety considerations involved. 18. Before parting, we deem it appropriate to remind the petitionerthattheethosofSabarimalaisdeeplyrootedinthesacredchant "TatTvamAsi",aSanskritmahāvākyameaning"ThatartThou"or"Youare That." This profound declaration, originating from the Chandogya 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :16: Upanishad, encapsulates the essence of Advaita Vedanta, that the individual self (Ātman) is one with the ultimate reality (Brahman). The principle of 'Tat Tvam Asi' enjoins reverence for all forms of life, emphasizingunityandinterconnectednessbetweenhumanbeings,nature, and the divine. Protecting the forest and preserving the sanctity of the Periyar Tiger Reserve, therefore, harmonize with, rather than contradict, the spiritual philosophy that underpins Lord Ayyappa's abode at Sabarimala. 19. In view of the discussion above, we hold that there is no reason to interfere with the strict regulatory controls imposed by the competent authorities to ensure the safety of pilgrims, conservation of wildlife, and the ecological integrity of the Periyar Tiger Reserve. This Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE Sd/- K.V. JAYAKUMAR, JUDGE PS/13/11/25 2025:KER:86782 WP(C) No. 41785 of 2025 :17: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41785/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUECOPY OFTHEVIRTUALBOOKING COUPONOF THE PETITIONER DATED 17.11.2025 Exhibit P2 A TRUECOPY OFTHENEWSPAPER ARTICLE'ANNUAL PILGRIMAGE TO SABARIMALA BEGINS AMID RAIN, COVID-19 CURBS' PUBLISHED BY ONMANORAMA ON 14.11.2021 Exhibit P3 A TRUECOPY OFTHENEWSPAPER ARTICLE'POLICE STOP SABARIMALA PILGRIMS FROM TREKKING VIA KARIMALA FOREST ROUTE READ MORE' PUBLISHED BY MATHRUBHUMI ON 22.12.2021 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE 'SABARIMALA: KARIMALA FORESTPATHTO BEOPEN FROM DEC 30' PUBLISHED BY MATHRUBHUMI ON 23.12.2021 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE 2023-2024 CALENDAR AS DISPLAYED BY THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD ON THEIR WEBSITE Exhibit P6 A TRUECOPY OFTHENEWSPAPER ARTICLE'KERALA GOVT EASES CURBS ON TREKKING THROUGH FOREST PATH TO SABARIMALA TEMPLE' PUBLISHED BYTHE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS ON 24.12.2023 RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R4(a) rue T copy of the map showing trek routes through PTR to Sabarimala.