Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Janakram vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 November, 2022

Author: Rajani Dubey

Bench: Rajani Dubey

                                                                  NAFR

           HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                       MCRC No. 8330 of 2022

    Janakram S/o Harvansh, aged about 45 years, R/o Bagdabri, PS
      and Tahsil Baloda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG)

                                                           ---- Applicant
                                                                  In Jail
                                 Versus
    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police
      Station Sipat, Distt. Bilaspur (CG)

                             MCRC No. 8385 of 2022

    Ramesh Kumar, S/o Shiv Kumar aged about 33 years, R/o
      Village-Hindadih, PS Sipat, Distt. Bilaspur (CG)

                                                           ---- Applicant
                                                                  In Jail
                                    Versus
    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police
      Station Sipat, Distt. Bilaspur (CG)

                                                         ---- Respondent
For Applicants           :      Mr. SK Verma, Advocate.
For Respondent/State     :      Mr. Roshan Dubey, Panel Lawyer.


                 Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
                             Order On Board
07/11/2022

Since both these second bail applications under Section 439 of CrPC for grant of regular bail arise out of Istagasa No.04/2022 registered at Police Station-Sipat, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 41(1-4) of CrPC and Sections 379, 411 of IPC, they are being disposed of by this common order. The first bail applications being MCRC Nos.6747/2022 and 6629/2022 were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after filing of charge sheet vide order dated 29.8.2022.

02. Allegation against the present applicants is that they along with other co-accused persons committed theft of diesel from different vehicles.

03. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent persons and have been falsely implicated in the crime in question merely on the basis of suspicion. The applicants are in jail since 24.6.2022 and 25.6.2022 respectively; co-accused persons have already been released on bail by this Court; charge sheet has already been filed and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time. Therefore, the applicants may be released on bail.

04. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail applications.

05. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

06. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations against the applicants, in particular the detention peroid of the applicants; co-accused persons have been released on bail; charge sheet has already been filed and that conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, without commenting anything on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail. Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed.

07. It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before the said Court as and when directed, till final disposal of the trial.

Sd/.

(Rajani Dubey) Judge Khan