Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Khalid.B.A vs State Of Kerala on 10 May, 2022

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

Crl.MC No.1823/2022                             1/1

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                         PRESENT
                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
                  Tuesday, the 10th day of May 2022 / 20th Vaisakha, 1944
                      CRL.M.APPL.NO.1/2022 IN CRL.MC NO. 1823 OF 2022

CRIME NO.378/2015 OF Bekal Police Station, Kasargod


CC 1228/2015 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,HOSDRUG, KASARGOD

   PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:

       1. KHALID.B.A AGED 31 YEARS SON OF ABDULLA, SHAMEER MANZIL, CHOICE
          LAND, MANGAD, BARE VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT., PIN
          - 671318
       2. ABDUL RAHIMAN AGED 29 YEARS SON OF M.ABDULLA, MARHABHA MANZIL,
          THAMARAKKUZHI, MANGAD, BARE VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD
          DISTRICT., PIN - 671318

   RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

       1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
       2. MANOJKUMAR.M.K @ MANU AGED 39 YEARS SON OF KUMARAN, R/AT PARAKKADAVU
          HOUSE, AMBAPURAM, BARA, BARA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD
          DISTRICT., PIN - 671318

        Application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the
   High Court be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.1228 of
   2015 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Hosdurg pending
   disposal of the above Crl.MC.
        This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
    and upon hearing the arguments of MR.A.ARUNKUMAR, Advocate for the
   petitioners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the 1st respondent, and of
   MR.VIPIN T JOSE, Advocate for the 2nd respondent, the court passed the
   following:

                                           ORDER

In the light of the alleged settlement, there will be an interim order as prayed for, for a period of one month.

Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE 10-05-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar