Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 12]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii vs Ashok J. Patel on 9 December, 2016

Author: Ashok Bhushan

Bench: Ashok Bhushan

                                           1


     ITEM NO.25                   COURT NO.10                SECTION IIIA

                         S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).       14698/2014

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2013
     in TA No. 1064/2013 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At
     Ahmedabad)

     CIT TAX-III                                             Petitioner(s)

                                          VERSUS

     ASHOK J. PATEL                                          Respondent(s)

     (office report on default)

     WITH
     SLP(C) No. 19974/2014
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 22282/2014
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 26781/2014
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 26649/2014
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 30639/2014
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 36797/2014
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 7156/2015
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 9747/2015
     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 10432/2015
     (office report on default)
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
NEELAM GULATI
Date: 2016.12.10

      SLP(C) No. 14580/2015
11:14:12 IST
Reason:


     (office report on default)

      SLP(C) No. 19305/2015
     (office report on default)
                                     2



Date : 09/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
                            [IN CHAMBER]


For Petitioner(s)        Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Adv.
                         Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv.
                         Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv.

For Respondent(s)


           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                              O R D E R

As prayed, six weeks' time is granted to do the needful.

(NEELAM GULATI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER