Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 14]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Rajasthan vs The State Of Rajasthan Nature Club Of ... on 2 April, 2018

Bench: Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta

                                                  1

     ITEM NO.41                           COURT NO.3                SECTION XV

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)        No(s).34134/2013

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-10-2013
     in DBCMA No. 250/2013 21-10-2013 in DBCWP No. 13189/2012 passed by
     the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur)

     STATE OF RAJASTHAN            & ORS.                               Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

     THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
     NATURE CLUB OF RAJASTHAN (NGO) AND ORS.                            Respondent(s)

     (WITH    Application     for     Direction    ON     IA     9/2017
     FOR         Application     for     Direction     ON     IA    10/2017
     and IA No.119289/2017-impleading party and IA No.119291/2017-
     CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.119298/2017-impleading party and
     IA No.119300/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.120769/2017-
     impleading party and IA No.120772/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
     FOR    EXEMPTION    FROM     FILING    O.T.    ON     IA    6/2016
     FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 11/2017 and IA No.25490/2018-
     CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.25491/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     O.T. and IA No.30044/2018-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION)

     WITH
     C.A. No. 9703-9706/2013 (XVII)
     SLP(C) No. 34811/2013 (XV)

     Date : 02-04-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA


     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.   V. Giri, Sr. Adv.
                                   Mr.   S.S. Shamshery, AAG
                                   Mr.   Shiv Mangal Sharma, AAG
                                   Mr.   Amit Sharma, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Ankit Raj, Adv.
                                   Ms.   Indira Bhakar, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                   Ms.   Ruchi Kohli, AOR
Digitally signed by
MEENAKSHI KOHLI
Date: 2018.04.04
17:28:25 IST
Reason:                            Ms. Pragati Neekhra, AOR

                                   Mr. Yashvardhan, Adv.
                                   Mr. Apoorv Shukla, Adv.
                                   Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, AOR
                                   2


For Respondent(s)   Mr.   Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr.   Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv.
                    Ms.   Sanjana Saddy, Adv.
                    Mr.   Alok Sangwan, Adv.
                    Mr.   Sunny Kadiyan, Adv.

                    Mr. Raj Panjwani, Sr. Adv.
                    Ms. Shibani Ghosh, AOR

                    Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR
                    Mr. Premtosh Mishra, adv.

                    Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR
                    Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv.

                    Mr.   Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr.   Sarad Kumar Singhania, Adv.
                    Mr.   Anis Kumar Gupta, Adv.
                    Mr.   G.S. Makker, Adv.

                    Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR

                    Mr. R. C. Kohli, AOR

                    Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi, AOR

                    Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, AOR

                    Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR

                    Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR
                    Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv.
                    Ms. Indu Misra, Adv.

                    Ms.   K. Enatoli Sema, AOR
                    Mr.   Edward Belho, Adv.
                    Mr.   Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
                    Mr.   K. Luikang Michael, adv.
                    Mr.   Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv.

                    Mr. Vijay Panjwani, AOR

                    Ms. Roopam Rai, Adv.
                    Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv.
                    Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR

                    Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR

                    Mr. Kuldeep Parihar, Adv.
                    Ms. Rachana Srivastava, AOR
                    Ms. Monika, Adv.
                             3

              Ms. Sudipta Sarkar, Adv.

              M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co

              Mr. Anil Grover, AAG
              Mr. Shivam Kumar, Adv.
              Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR

              Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR

              Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, Adv.
              Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv.
              Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR

              Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv.
              Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv.
              Mrs. G. Indira, Adv.

              Mr. Abhinav Shrivasatava, Adv.
              Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv.
              Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv.

              Mr. Harsh Hiroo Gosahani, Adv.
              Mr. Amit Verma, Adv.
              Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv.

              Mr.   Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv.
              Mr.   Daniel Stone Lyngdoh, Adv.
              Ms.   Mandakani Singh, Adv.
              Ms.   Ashima Mandla, Adv.

              Mr.   S. Prasad, Sr. Adv.
              Mr.   Anand Varma, Adv.
              Mr.   Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, Adv.
              Ms.   Shubhangi Jain, Adv.


 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                        O R D E R

The information required by the Expert Appraisal Committee will be given, according to learned counsel for the State of Rajasthan, within a week. After the information is received as required, the Expert Appraisal Committee will look into it and submit the report.

List the matter after three weeks. 4 I.A. No.46551/2018 Issue notice.

Ms. Ruchi Kohli, learned counsel for the State of Rajasthan accepts notice and seeks time to file reply. Reply be filed within two weeks.

List the application with the main matter after three weeks.

I.A. No.1 & 2/2013 Exemption from filing O.T. granted. List I.A. No.1 with the main matter. I.A. No.3 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.

Application is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. Nos.4,5,6, 7 & 8 The applications are dismissed. I.A. Nos.42026/2018 & 42029/2018 The applications are dismissed. I.A. Nos.120769/2017 & I.A. Nos.120772/2017 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the applications.

Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No.25490/2018 & 25491/2018 Learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw the applications and file a fresh application making specific averments.

5

Leave and liberty granted.

Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No.119289/2017 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.

Application is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. Nos.119298 & 119300/2017 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the applications.

Applications are dismissed as withdrawn.




 (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                         (KAILASH CHANDER)
    AR-CUM-PS                               COURT MASTER